...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Insights >How are established, subscription-based publishers making the transition to open access?
【24h】

How are established, subscription-based publishers making the transition to open access?

机译：已建立的，基于订阅的发布者如何过渡到开放访问？

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

To some, the publishing industry seems to move at pace measured in geological ages, especially when compared to the fast-moving digital and technology industries. Many have described how publishers were caught on the back foot by the move of open access (OA) from the fringes of publishing to the mainstream, particularly within the UK following the publication of the ‘Finch’ Report. OA has had a marked influence on the publishing industry, leading publishers to reflect on current practices, to have a much more granular approach to systems and processes, and to be engaging even more than previously with other players in the publishing landscape. OA is both a strategic challenge and an opportunity. But for a publisher like Taylor & Francis with a significant number of subscription-based journals, OA creates new levels of complexity, and requires the ability to adapt to new requirements within short timeframes.
机译：在某些人看来，出版业似乎正在按照地质时代的步伐发展，特别是与快速发展的数字和技术产业相比。许多人描述了开放获取（OA）从出版边缘向主流，特别是在“ Finch”报告发布后在英国内部的发展如何使出版商陷入困境。 OA对出版业产生了显着影响，导致出版商反思当前的做法，对系统和流程采取更加细化的方法，并与出版界的其他参与者进行比以往更多的参与。 OA既是战略挑战，也是机遇。但是对于像Taylor＆Francis这样的发行商来说，拥有大量基于订阅的期刊，OA创造了新的复杂性水平，并且需要能够在短时间内适应新要求的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号