...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Insights >Key Issue - Out of the shadows: the case for a national repository of open content
【24h】

Key Issue - Out of the shadows: the case for a national repository of open content

机译：关键问题-走出阴影：国家开放内容存储库

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Looking back on the history of the open access (OA) movement in the UK from a library perspective, we can see that it has been a journey towards a not fully clear destination, motivated differently at different times, and yet nonetheless a journey undertaken with seriousness and a determination to see change. Working in the scholarly communications field back at the time of the Budapest Initiative in 2002, it seemed to me and to colleagues in other research university libraries throughout the UK that we had found the solution to the besetting problem of our new digital age, the accelerating rise in the cost of journals, or the ‘serials pricing crisis’. Librarians on both sides of the Atlantic soon became very familiar with early versions of this graph (Figure 1), produced by the Association of Research Libraries. It clearly shows the price of serials rising frighteningly and unsustainably, illustrating both apparent profiteering by the publishers concerned, and the prospect for libraries of having to make cancellations on a large scale.
机译：从图书馆的角度回顾英国开放存取（OA）运动的历史，我们可以看到，这是一个通往一个不完全清晰的目的地的旅程，在不同的时间受到不同的动机，然而，认真和决心看到变化。早在2002年布达佩斯倡议（Budapest Initiative）时，我就在学术传播领域工作，在我和整个英国其他研究型大学图书馆的同事看来，我们已经找到了解决我们新数字时代不断发展的难题的方法，期刊成本上升或“系列定价危机”。大西洋两岸的图书馆员很快就对由研究图书馆协会制作的该图的早期版本（图1）非常熟悉。它清楚地显示了连续出版物的价格令人震惊且不可持续地上涨，既说明了有关出版商的明显牟取暴利，又说明了图书馆必须大规模取消的前景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号