首页> 外文期刊>Insights >Green or gold? Open access after Finch
【24h】

Green or gold? Open access after Finch

机译:绿色还是金色?芬奇后开放访问

获取原文
           

摘要

The Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings reported to the UK's Minister of Universities and Science in mid-2012. This was followed by a new policy for open access (OA) publishing by Research Councils UK (RCUK) as well as a commitment from the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) to require that research submitted to future research evaluation exercises – after the 2014 Research Excellence Framework (REF) – be open access. These initiatives build on a broad consensus, that includes for-profit publishers, that open access is the way of the future. Here, I give a perspective on these issues, both as the head of an institution with particular interests in the future of scholarly publication and also as a member of the Working Group on Expanding Access. The continuing development of informed debate will be critical for the future of the scholarly publishing system.
机译:2012年中,向英国大学与科学部部长汇报了扩大获取已发表研究成果的机会的工作组。随后,英国研究委员会(RCUK)颁布了一项新的开放获取(OA)政策,并且英格兰高等教育资助委员会(HEFCE)做出了一项承诺,要求在研究成果发布后将研究成果提交给未来的研究评估工作。 2014年卓越研究框架(REF)–开放获取。这些举措建立在包括营利性出版商在内的广泛共识之上,即开放获取是未来的方式。在这里,我作为一个对未来的学术出版特别感兴趣的机构的负责人,以及作为扩大获取机会工作组的成员,就这些问题发表了看法。知情辩论的不断发展对于学术出版体系的未来至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号