...
首页> 外文期刊>Insights >What researchers told us about their experiences and expectations of scholarly communications ecosystems
【24h】

What researchers told us about their experiences and expectations of scholarly communications ecosystems

机译:研究人员向我们介绍了他们对学术交流生态系统的经历和期望

获取原文
           

摘要

Publishers, vendors and librarians often discuss the needs of the researcher. However, it is not often that information professionals have the opportunity to sit down with a group of researchers, listen to their perspective and ask them questions. The UKSG One-Day Conference held in London in November 2016 offered such an opportunity with a panel session of researchers chaired by Charlie Rapple of Kudos. The researchers shared with us their frustrations about scholarly communications ecosystems and their ideas for improvements. A major source of frustration is the need for academics to publish, and publish well, to keep their jobs and progress. In doing so, they face what seem to be often insurmountable obstacles that they feel powerless to address or change. Themes of the session were the lack of incentives to peer review and join editorial boards, the role of social networking sites, open access and collaboration with libraries. The researchers who so generously gave us their time are Professor Andy Miah (University of Salford), Dr Mi?chea?l O? Fathartaigh (Dublin Business School) and Dr Sabina Michnowicz (Hazard Centre, University College London).
机译:出版商,销售商和图书馆员经常讨论研究人员的需求。但是,信息专业人士很少有机会与一组研究人员坐下来,倾听他们的观点并向他们提问。 2016年11月在伦敦举行的UKSG一日会议提供了这样的机会,由Kudos的Charlie Rapple主持的研究人员小组会议。研究人员与我们分享了他们对学术交流生态系统的挫败感以及他们的改进想法。挫败感的一个主要根源是学者们需要发表并发表得很好,以保持他们的工作和进步。在这样做时,他们面临着似乎常常无法克服的障碍,他们觉得无力应对或改变。本届会议的主题是缺乏激励同行评审和加入编辑委员会的动机,社交网站的作用,开放访问以及与图书馆的合作。慷慨地给我们时间的研究人员是Andy Miah教授(索尔福德大学),Mi?chea?l O?博士。 Fathartaigh(都柏林商学院)和Sabina Michnowicz博士(伦敦大学学院危险中心)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号