• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Affective Engineering >Printed Book or E-book, Which is Better? An Investigation using Manga and Magazine
【24h】

Printed Book or E-book, Which is Better? An Investigation using Manga and Magazine

机译：印刷书籍或电子书，哪个更好？使用漫画和杂志进行调查

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The market of e-book has been growing fast and showing a great potential recently. However, the traditional printed books are still predominating the major market. Most people still prefer printed book despite e-book's advantages. In this study, we conducted an experiment involving 34 participants to determine the difference between e-book and printed book in terms of user experience. We hypothesized that different contents would influence the result, therefore we chose two different genres of books: magazine and the Japanese comic book - manga. Participants were asked to read on E-Reader and printed book, then asked to evaluate their experience using questionnaire. ANOVA, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, multiple regression analysis and principal component analysis were conducted to analyze the difference between each group and correlative factors that affected overall evaluation. The result indicated that printed books were rated higher than e-books, and manga was more applicable to e-book than magazine.
机译：电子书市场一直在快速增长，并显示出巨大的潜力。但是，传统印刷书籍仍占主要市场。尽管电子书具有很多优势，但大多数人仍然喜欢印刷书籍。在这项研究中，我们进行了一个实验，涉及34位参与者，以确定用户体验方面的电子书和印刷书之间的差异。我们假设不同的内容会影响结果，因此我们选择了两种不同类型的书籍：杂志和日本漫画-漫画。要求参与者阅读电子阅读器和印刷书籍，然后要求他们使用问卷调查评估他们的经验。进行方差分析，Wilcoxon符号秩检验，多元回归分析和主成分分析，以分析各组之间的差异以及影响整体评估的相关因素。结果表明，印刷书籍的评级高于电子书籍，而漫画比电子杂志更适用于电子书籍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号