首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Disaster Risk Science >Journey Through the Groan Zone with Academics and Practitioners: Bridging Conflict and Difference to Strengthen Disaster Risk Reduction and Recovery Work
【24h】

Journey Through the Groan Zone with Academics and Practitioners: Bridging Conflict and Difference to Strengthen Disaster Risk Reduction and Recovery Work

机译:与学者和从业人员一起走过an吟区的旅程:弥合冲突和差异,加强减少灾害风险和恢复工作

获取原文
           

摘要

Academic-practitioner divides in disaster management and research can be persistent and pernicious, bearing consequences for disaster survivors and future affected populations. The gap between disaster professionals and academic researchers is often treated as an unavoidable structural problem or a neutral accident of professional silos and circumstance. We suggest that these gaps are not neutral, and that they can and must be overcome. With hundreds of millions of people affected by disaster each year and recovery costs skyrocketing, there is urgency in connecting researcher and practitioner knowledges to avoid expensive mistakes and most importantly, to decrease human suffering. Yet the difficulties that US academic anthropologists and practitioners experienced in their efforts to collaborate became evident in a cross-sector National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded workshop on the relevance of culture in disaster work. We suggest and illustrate how more systematic cross-field communication can be operationalized through engaging in an ongoing and relational process of bridging. Such a process can offer long-term benefits to the people and institutions involved, dramatically enhance the science of disaster management, and help reduce the social and material costs of disaster impacts.
机译:学术从业人员在灾难管理和研究上的分歧可能是持久而有害的,给灾难幸存者和未来受影响的人群带来后果。灾难专业人员与学术研究人员之间的鸿沟通常被视为不可避免的结构性问题或专业孤岛和情况的中性事故。我们建议这些差距不是中立的,可以并且必须克服。每年有数亿人受到灾难影响,并且恢复成本飞涨,因此迫切需要将研究人员和从业人员的知识联系起来,以避免昂贵的错误,最重要的是减少人类的痛苦。然而,美国学术人类学家和实践者在努力合作中遇到的困难在由美国国家科学基金会(NSF)资助的跨部门研讨会中就文化在灾害工作中的相关性变得显而易见。我们建议并说明如何通过参与正在进行的和相关的桥接过程来实现更系统的跨领域通信。这样的过程可以为相关人员和机构带来长期利益,极大地增强灾难管理的科学性,并有助于降低灾难影响的社会和物质成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号