...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Yes, The Government Should Tax Soft Drinks: Findings from a Citizens’ Jury in Australia
【24h】

Yes, The Government Should Tax Soft Drinks: Findings from a Citizens’ Jury in Australia

机译:是的,政府应向软饮料征税:澳大利亚公民陪审团的调查结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Taxation has been suggested as a possible preventive strategy to address the serious public health concern of childhood obesity. Understanding the public’s viewpoint on the potential role of taxation is vital to inform policy decisions if they are to be acceptable to the wider community. A Citizens’ Jury is a deliberative method for engaging the public in decision making and can assist in setting policy agendas. A Citizens’ Jury was conducted in Brisbane, Australia in May 2013 to answer the question: Is taxation on food and drinks an acceptable strategy to the public in order to reduce rates of childhood obesity? Citizens were randomly selected from the electoral roll and invited to participate. Thirteen members were purposively sampled from those expressing interest to broadly reflect the diversity of the Australian public. Over two days, participants were presented with evidence on the topic by experts, were able to question witnesses and deliberate on the evidence. The jurors unanimously supported taxation on sugar-sweetened drinks but generally did not support taxation on processed meats, snack foods and foods eaten/ purchased outside the home. They also supported taxation on snack foods on the condition that traffic light labelling was also introduced. Though they were not specifically asked to deliberate strategies outside of taxation, the jurors strongly recommended more nutritional information on all food packaging using the traffic light and teaspoon labelling systems for sugar, salt and fat content. The Citizens’ Jury suggests that the general public may support taxation on sugar-sweetened drinks to reduce rates of obesity in children. Regulatory reforms of taxation on sugar-sweetened drinks and improved labelling of nutritional information on product packaging were strongly supported by all members of the jury. These reforms should be considered by governments to prevent childhood obesity and the future burden on society from the consequences of obesity.
机译:有人认为,税收是解决儿童肥胖引起的严重公共卫生问题的一种可能的预防策略。了解公众对于征税的潜在作用的观点,对于为更广泛的社区所接受是至关重要的。公民陪审团是一种让公众参与决策的审议方法,可以帮助制定政策议程。 2013年5月,在澳大利亚的布里斯班举行了公民陪审团,以回答以下问题:为降低儿童肥胖率,对食品和饮料征税是否是公众可接受的策略?从选举名单中随机选择公民,并邀请他们参加。目的是从那些表示有兴趣的人士中抽取13名成员,以广泛反映澳大利亚公众的多样性。在两天的时间里,专家们向参与者提供了有关该主题的证据,他们可以质询证人并研究证据。陪审员一致支持对含糖饮料征收税,但通常不支持对加工肉类,零食和在家庭外购买/购买的食品征税。他们还支持对休闲食品征税,但前提是还要引入交通信号灯标签。尽管没有特别要求他们考虑税收以外的策略,但陪审员们强烈建议使用交通信号灯和茶匙标签系统针对糖,盐和脂肪含量的所有食品包装提供更多的营养信息。公民陪审团建议,公众可以支持对含糖饮料征收税收,以降低儿童的肥胖率。陪审团所有成员都大力支持对含糖饮料的税收进行监管改革,并改善产品包装上的营养信息标签。政府应考虑采取这些改革措施,以防止儿童肥胖以及肥胖带来的未来社会负担。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号