...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Quiet as an Environmental Value: A Contrast between Two Legislative Approaches
【24h】

Quiet as an Environmental Value: A Contrast between Two Legislative Approaches

机译：安静是一种环境价值：两种立法方法之间的对比

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper examines the concept of “quiet” as an “environmental value” in terms of amenity and wellbeing from a legislative context. Critical review of two pieces of environmental legislation from Australia and New Zealand forms the basis of the paper. The Australian legislation is Queensland’s Environmental Protection Act, and the New Zealand legislation is that nation’s Resource Management Act. Quiet is part of the psychoacoustic continuum between a tranquil and an intrusively noisy sound environment. As such, quiet possesses intrinsic value in terms of overall sound within the environment (soundscape) and to individuals and communities. In both pieces of legislation, guidance, either directly or indirectly, is given to “maximum” sound levels to describe the acoustic environment. Only in Queensland is wellbeing and amenity described as environmental values, while in the New Zealand approach, amenity is identified as the core value to defend, but guidance is not well established. Wellbeing can be related to degrees of quietness and the absence of intrusive noise, the character of sound within an environment (“soundscape”), as well as the overall level of sound. The quality of life experienced by individuals is related to that person’s physical and mental health, sense of amenity and wellbeing. These characteristics can be described in terms of subjective and objective measures, though legislation does not always acknowledge the subjective.
机译：本文从立法环境的舒适性和福祉角度考察了“安静”作为“环境价值”的概念。对澳大利亚和新西兰的两项环境法规的严格审查构成了本文的基础。澳大利亚的立法是昆士兰州的《环境保护法》，新西兰的立法是该国的《资源管理法》。安静是介于安静和嘈杂的声音环境之间的心理声学连续性的一部分。因此，就环境（声音景观）以及个人和社区的整体声音而言，安静具有内在价值。在这两项立法中，都直接或间接地指导了“最大”声级以描述声学环境。仅在昆士兰州将福祉和舒适性描述为环境价值，而在新西兰方法中，舒适性被确定为捍卫的核心价值，但指导思想尚不完善。健康可能与安静程度和不存在干扰性噪声，环境中声音的特征（“声景”）以及整体声音水平有关。个人的生活质量与该人的身心健康，舒适感和幸福感有关。这些特征可以用主观和客观的方法来描述，尽管立法并不总是承认主观的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号