...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >The Role of Work-Related Factors in the Development of Psychological Distress and Associated Mental Disorders: Differential Views of Human Resource Managers, Occupational Physicians, Primary Care Physicians and Psychotherapists in Germany
【24h】

The Role of Work-Related Factors in the Development of Psychological Distress and Associated Mental Disorders: Differential Views of Human Resource Managers, Occupational Physicians, Primary Care Physicians and Psychotherapists in Germany

机译：与工作有关的因素在心理困扰和相关心理障碍发展中的作用：德国人力资源经理，职业医师，初级保健医师和心理治疗师的不同见解

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objectives : This study analyses the perceived relevance of stress-dimensions in work-settings from the differential views of Human Resource Managers (HRM), Occupational Physicians (OP), Primary Care Physicians (PCP) and Psychotherapists (PT) in Germany. Methods : Cross-sectional study design, using a self-report questionnaire. Descriptive measures and explorative bivariate methods were applied for group-comparisons. Results are presented as rankings of perceived importance and as polarity profiles of contrasting views. Results: N = 627 participants completed the questionnaires (HRM: n = 172; OP: n = 133; PCP: n = 136; PT: n = 186). The stress dimensions with the highest mean ratings across all four professions were: ‘social relationships in the work place’ ( M = 3.55, SD = 0.62) and ‘superiors′ leadership style’ ( M = 3.54, SD = 0.64). Mean ratings of perceived relevance of stress dimensions differed most between HRM and the three medical professions. Conclusions : The perceived importance of work-related stress-dimensions seems to be higher in the medical disciplines (OP, PCP, PT) than in the group from the management sector (HRM). However, no fundamental disagreement on the role of work-related stress-dimensions seems to hinder e.g., intensified efforts of cooperation across sectors in tackling the “stress-pandemic” and improving the (mental) health of employees.
机译：目的：本研究从德国的人力资源经理（HRM），职业医师（OP），初级保健医师（PCP）和心理治疗师（PT）的不同角度分析了工作场所压力维度的感知相关性。方法：采用自我报告调查表进行横断面研究设计。描述性测量和探索性双变量方法用于组比较。结果表示为感知重要性的等级以及对比视图的极性配置文件。结果：N = 627名参与者完成了问卷（HRM：n = 172; OP：n = 133; PCP：n = 136; PT：n = 186）。在所有四个职业中，平均得分最高的压力维度是：“工作场所的社会关系”（M = 3.55，SD = 0.62）和“上级”领导风格（M = 3.54，SD = 0.64）。 HRM和这三个医学专业之间，感知到的与压力大小相关的平均评分差异最大。结论：在医学领域（OP，PCP，PT），与工作相关的压力维度的重要性似乎比来自管理部门（HRM）的人群更高。但是，对于与工作有关的压力维度的作用，没有根本的分歧似乎会阻碍，例如，在解决“压力大流行”和改善员工的（心理）健康方面，各部门之间加大合作力度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号