首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Business and Management >Fraud Detection and Audit Expectation Gap: Empirical Evidence from Iranian Bankers
【24h】

Fraud Detection and Audit Expectation Gap: Empirical Evidence from Iranian Bankers

机译:欺诈检测和审计期望差距:来自伊朗银行家的经验证据

获取原文
           

摘要

Our focus in this study is to determine the expectation gap in auditor’s responsibility between auditors and bankers in Iran. In the view on the fact, the key factor in enhanced credibility is the perception of stakeholders that the external auditors judge to financial statements providing through the management. In recent years corporate scandals were happened, so third parties demand auditors should be as an honest judge. Third parties expect the auditors should have more responsibility to detect fraud. The auditors although they view their role as bringing credibility to financial statements, know because of scope want limitation of their responsibility cannot detect all kinds of fraud. Therefore there is so called gap. Our findings indicate that there is significant gap between auditors and bankers in areas of auditor’s responsibilities to detection fraud and illegal acts. In this study, the authors came to conclusion that the bankers have reasonableness expectation gap from auditors.
机译:我们在这项研究中的重点是确定伊朗的审计师和银行家之间在审计师责任方面的期望差距。从事实的角度来看,增强信誉的关键因素是外部审计师判断通过管理层提供的财务报表对利益相关者的看法。近年来发生了公司丑闻,因此第三方要求审计师应作为诚实的法官。第三方期望审计师应承担更多发现欺诈的责任。审计师们虽然认为他们的作用是使财务报表具有公信力,但由于范围所限,他们知道自己的责任范围无法发现各种欺诈。因此,存在所谓的差距。我们的发现表明,在审计师发现欺诈和非法行为的责任方面,审计师与银行家之间存在很大差距。在这项研究中,作者得出的结论是,银行家与审计师之间存在合理的期望差距。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号