...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Gerontology >Comparison of High- and Low-dose Dexamethasone for Preventing Postextubation Airway Obstruction in Adults: A Prospective, Randomized, Double blind, Placebo-controlled Study
【24h】

Comparison of High- and Low-dose Dexamethasone for Preventing Postextubation Airway Obstruction in Adults: A Prospective, Randomized, Double blind, Placebo-controlled Study

机译:高剂量和低剂量地塞米松预防成人拔管后气道阻塞的比较:一项前瞻性,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The study investigated the effectiveness of dexamethasone injections for reducing the occurrence of postextubation airway obstruction (PEAO). Methods: One hundred and thirty-eight patients who were intubated for >= 48 hours with a cuff-leak volume (CLV) < 110 mL were treated with low-dose dexamethasone (5 mg; n = 41), high-dose dexamethasone (10 mg; n = 42), or placebo (normal saline; n = 43) injection every 6 hours for a total of four doses on the day preceding extubation. CLV was measured before the first injection, 1 hour after each injection, and 24 hours after the fourth injection. Extubation was performed 24 hours after the last injection. PEAO was recorded within 48 hours postextubation. Results: Administration of dexamethasone resulted in a significant increase in absolute CLV and change of CLV relative to baseline tidal volume occurred (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the low- and high-dose dexamethasone groups. The incidence of PEAO was 7.1% in the high-dose group, 9.8% in the low-dose group, and 30.2% in the placebo group. The incidence of PEAO differed significantly between the dexamethasone groups and the placebo group (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the reintubation rates among the high-dose group (2.1%, 1/42), the low-dose group (2.4%, 1/41), and the placebo group (4.7%, 2/43; p = 0.79). Conclusion: Prophylactic administration of multiple low-dose dexamethasone is sufficient for reducing the incidence of PEAO in high-risk patients.
机译:背景:该研究调查了地塞米松注射液减少拔管后气道阻塞(PEAO)发生的有效性。方法:138例患者,其袖带漏量(CLV)<110 mL插管> = 48小时,接受低剂量地塞米松(5 mg; n = 41),大剂量地塞米松(拔管前一天每6小时注射10 mg; n = 42)或安慰剂(生理盐水; n = 43),共4剂。在第一次注射前,每次注射后1小时和第四次注射后24小时测量CLV。在最后一次注射后24小时进行拔管。拔管后48小时内记录PEAO。结果:地塞米松的使用导致绝对CLV显着增加,并且CLV相对于基线潮气量发生了变化(p <0.05)。但是,低剂量和高剂量地塞米松组之间没有显着差异。高剂量组PEAO的发生率为7.1%,低剂量组为9.8%,安慰剂组为30.2%。地塞米松组和安慰剂组之间PEAO的发生率显着不同(p = 0.001)。高剂量组(2.1%,1/42),低剂量组(2.4%,1/41)和安慰剂组(4.7%,2/43)之间的再插管率没有显着差异。 p = 0.79)。结论:多次低剂量地塞米松的预防性给药足以降低高危患者PEAO的发生率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号