...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Integrated Care >Realist Research Design and Evaluation for Integrated Care SIG (RIC) - Part 2: Realist Quantitative Methods for Integrated Care Design and Evaluation
【24h】

Realist Research Design and Evaluation for Integrated Care SIG (RIC) - Part 2: Realist Quantitative Methods for Integrated Care Design and Evaluation

机译：整体护理SIG（RIC）的现实主义研究设计和评估-第2部分：整体护理设计和评估的现实主义定量方法

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background : Realist research methodology is increasingly being used for the design and evaluation of integrated care initiatives. Much of current realist research and evaluation is qualitative in nature and yet many realist methodologists, including Pawson, Tilley, Sayer and Olsen, have argued for the use of mixed methods. There remains much debate regarding the role of quantitative methods, including statistics, within a critical realist philosophical framework. For many realist researchers the use of quantitative methods is both a philosophical and methodological stumbling block. Yet quantitative methods can contribute to realist theory building,, design and theory testing through their ability to use observable events to infer the existence of underlying mechanisms and to detect changes in both context and outcomes. This workshop will examine debates about the use of quantitative methods in realist research and evaluation, either as part of a mixed-method design or on their own. Examples of their use for both theory development and theory testing will be provided. The workshop will provide practical demonstration of the use of quantitative methods for both small and large scale studies. Knowledge, techniques and practices to be addressed include: The philosophical debates concerning the use of quantitative methods for realist research and evaluation Quantitative methods used for explanatory theory building research Construction of quantitative tools from qualitative data Quantitative methods used for evaluation and theory testing Application of quantitative methods within realist mixed method study designs Practical application of quantitative analysis to infer mechanistic action. By the conclusion of the workshop, participants should be able to: Understand the philosophical rejection of quantitative methods for both natural and social scientific realms Determine how to interpret quantitative methods and incorporate them into realist research and evaluation while maintaining a distinction between method and methodology Describe quantitative methods for inclusion in realist mixed method research and/or evaluation study designs Undertake practical realist analysis of quantitative study data using simple statistical methods. Aims and Objectives : 1) To examine debates about the use of quantitative methods in realist research and evaluation, either as part of a mixed-method design or on their own. 2) To demonstrate the use of realist quantitative methods for both integrated care design and evaluation. Format : 90 minutes, one speaker and facilitator, Group work at tables using problem-based learning. Discussion, debate and learning resources. Target Audience : Integrated care design and evaluation practitioners and researchers. Qualitative and quantitative researchers. Mixed methodologists. Learning and Takeaway : Increased understanding of how quantitative methods can be appropriately used with realist methodology. Introduction to the use of advanced quantitative methods for design and evaluation of integrated care initiatives including latent class analysis, latent variable pathways, and discontiuity quasiexperimental designs.
机译：背景：现实主义的研究方法越来越多地用于综合护理计划的设计和评估。当前许多现实主义者的研究和评估本质上是定性的，但是许多现实主义者的方法学家，包括Pawson，Tilley，Sayer和Olsen，都主张使用混合方法。在一个重要的现实主义哲学框架内，关于包括统计学在内的定量方法的作用仍然存在很多争论。对于许多现实主义者来说，定量方法的使用既是哲学上的方法论障碍，也是方法论上的绊脚石。然而，定量方法可以通过使用可观察的事件来推断潜在机制的存在并检测上下文和结果的变化来促进现实主义的理论构建，设计和理论测试。该研讨会将探讨有关在现实主义研究和评估中使用定量方法的争论，这些讨论既可以作为混合方法设计的一部分，也可以单独进行。将提供在理论发展和理论测试中使用它们的示例。讲习班将为小规模和大规模研究提供定量方法使用的实践证明。需要解决的知识，技术和实践包括：关于在现实主义研究和评估中使用定量方法的哲学辩论在解释性理论构建研究中使用定量方法从定性数据构建定量工具用于评估和理论测试的定量方法定量应用现实混合方法研究设计中的方法定量分析在推断机械作用中的实际应用。通过研讨会的结束，参与者应该能够：了解自然和社会科学领域对定量方法的哲学拒绝确定如何解释定量方法并将其纳入现实主义研究和评估，同时保持方法与方法之间的区别描述包含在现实主义混合方法研究和/或评估研究设计中的定量方法使用简单的统计方法对定量研究数据进行实际的现实主义分析。目的和目标：1）研究关于在现实主义研究和评估中使用定量方法的争论，这既可以作为混合方法设计的一部分，也可以单独进行。 2）演示在综合护理设计和评估中使用现实主义的量化方法。格式：90分钟，一位发言人和主持人，使用基于问题的学习在小组会议上进行小组工作。讨论，辩论和学习资源。目标受众：综合护理设计和评估从业人员和研究人员。定性和定量研究人员。混合方法学家。学习和收获：越来越多的了解如何将定量方法与现实方法相结合。介绍使用先进的定量方法进行综合护理计划的设计和评估，包括潜在类别分析，潜在变量路径和不连续准实验设计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号