...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Population Data Science >Evaluating the impacts on health outcomes of Welsh Government funded schemes designed to improve the energy efficiency of the homes of low income households: A comparison of individual level and area based schemes.
【24h】

Evaluating the impacts on health outcomes of Welsh Government funded schemes designed to improve the energy efficiency of the homes of low income households: A comparison of individual level and area based schemes.

机译:评估威尔士政府资助的旨在改善低收入家庭住房能源效率的计划对健康结果的影响:个人级别和基于区域的计划的比较。

获取原文
           

摘要

IntroductionLiving in a cold and/or damp house can damage health. To reduce fuel poverty in Wales, the Welsh Government developed domestic energy efficiency schemes - an individual-level scheme, Warm Homes Nest and an area-based scheme, Warm Homes Arbed. Both schemes provide improvements to those most likely affected by fuel poverty. Objectives and ApproachOverall aim: to evaluate the health impacts of Welsh Government funded schemes designed to reduce fuel poverty. Presented objective: to investigate the relative impact of the individual-level and area-based schemes on the health of recipients. A longitudinal dataset was created using the anonymised residence that received improvements linked to residents’ health measures (hospital admissions, GP prescriptions and clinical diagnoses) using routine health records held in the SAIL Databank at Swansea University. We used difference-in-difference (DID) estimations to compare any changes in recipient health before and after intervention with any concurrent change in health in those yet to receive the intervention. ResultsAn analysis of the Warm Homes Nest Scheme, published in 2017 and presented at the IPDLN 2017 conference found a positive impact of the scheme on the health of recipients. This presentation will describe the further analysis (concluding shortly) comparing the area-based Arbed scheme with both the recipients of the individual-level Nest scheme and groups in comparable need that had not yet received the intervention. We will present results focussing on the relative impacts of the two schemes on cardiovascular, respiratory and general health. Conclusion/ImplicationsProviding home energy efficiency interventions has the potential to benefit population health; however, there is a scarcity of evidence comparing different methods of implementing schemes. Our findings will inform more effectively-focussed home energy efficiency schemes and potentially thus improve the health of people living in Wales.
机译:简介在寒冷和/或潮湿的房屋中生活可能会损害健康。为了减少威尔士的燃油贫困,威尔士政府制定了国内能效计划,即个人级别的计划“暖房之巢”和一个基于区域的计划“暖房Arbed”。两种方案都为那些最有可能受到燃料贫困影响的人提供了改进。目标和方法总体目标:评估威尔士政府资助的旨在减少燃料贫困的计划对健康的影响。提出的目标:调查个人和基于地区的计划对接受者健康的相对影响。使用匿名住所创建了一个纵向数据集,该住所使用了斯旺西大学SAIL数据库中的常规健康记录,获得了与居民健康措施(医院入院,全科医生处方和临床诊断)相关的改进。我们使用差异差异(DID)估计来比较干预前后受试者健康状况的任何变化与尚待接受干预的受试者健康状况的同时变化。结果2017年发表并在IPDLN 2017会议上发表的对``暖舍建设计划''的分析发现,该计划对接受者的健康产生了积极影响。本演讲将描述进一步的分析(不久结束),将基于区域的Arbed方案与个人级Nest方案的接收者以及尚未接受干预的具有可比需求的群体进行比较。我们将以两个方案对心血管,呼吸道和总体健康的相对影响为重点,介绍研究结果。结论/意义提供家庭能源效率干预措施有可能有益于人口健康;但是,缺乏证据比较执行方案的不同方法。我们的发现将为更有效地关注家庭能源效率计划提供依据,并有可能因此改善居住在威尔士的人们的健康。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号