...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences >Our experience of enteral and parenteral nutrition support assessment in Turkey
【24h】

Our experience of enteral and parenteral nutrition support assessment in Turkey

机译：我们在土耳其进行肠内和肠外营养支持评估的经验

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: Enteral nutrition (EN) is administration of macro-micro nutrients to gastrointestinal system (GIS) through nasofeeding tubing (NF) (nasogastric, nasoduodenal, nasojejunal) or percutaneous access path. We aimed to evaluate demographic data's, nutrition pathways, number of feeding days, the reasons for the outcome, domain enteral and parenteral nutrition support (ENS and PNS). Methods: The sample is formed with 2113 ENS patients and 5438 PNS patients. Specified in the objective parameters were retrospectively followed by clinical nutrition unit (CNU). Results: 2113 and 5438 patients respectively were given ENS and PNS. The cause of termination was mostly death. 387 patients of PNS became apparent that with the use of enteral and parenteral access path area. These patients were fed an average of 3.14 days in combination. Conclusions: Although our results show that ENS is lower than PNS, ENS is preferred to PNS because of safety, effectiveness and low cost. PNS is an important diet in patients who haven't got adequate oral intake or non-oral feeding. CNU should be established in hospitals and patients should be closely monitored.
机译：背景：肠内营养（EN）是通过鼻饲管（NF）（鼻胃，鼻十二指肠，鼻空肠）或经皮进入途径向胃肠系统（GIS）施用微量营养素。我们旨在评估人口统计数据，营养途径，进食天数，结局原因，肠内和肠外营养支持（ENS和PNS）。方法：由2113名ENS患者和5438名PNS患者组成样本。在客观参数中指定的是临床营养单位（CNU）。结果：分别给2113例和5438例患者进行了ENS和PNS治疗。终止的原因主要是死亡。 387名PNS患者通过肠内和肠胃外通路区域变得很明显。这些患者平均被联合喂养3.14天。结论：尽管我们的结果表明ENS低于PNS，但ENS在安全性，有效性和低成本方面优于PNS。对于没有足够的口服摄入量或非口服喂养的患者，PNS是重要的饮食。应该在医院建立CNU，并应密切监测患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号