...
首页> 外文期刊>Investigative Genetics >DNA fingerprinting in botany: past, present, future
【24h】

DNA fingerprinting in botany: past, present, future

机译:植物学中的DNA指纹识别:过去,现在,未来

获取原文
           

摘要

Almost three decades ago Alec Jeffreys published his seminal Nature papers on the use of minisatellite probes for DNA fingerprinting of humans (Jeffreys and colleagues Nature 1985, 314:67–73 and Nature 1985, 316:76–79). The new technology was soon adopted for many other organisms including plants, and when Hilde Nybom, Kurt Weising and Alec Jeffreys first met at the very First International Conference on DNA Fingerprinting in Berne, Switzerland, in 1990, everybody was enthusiastic about the novel method that allowed us for the first time to discriminate between humans, animals, plants and fungi on the individual level using DNA markers. A newsletter coined “Fingerprint News” was launched, T-shirts were sold, and the proceedings of the Berne conference filled a first book on “DNA fingerprinting: approaches and applications”. Four more conferences were about to follow, one on each continent, and Alec Jeffreys of course was invited to all of them. Since these early days, methodologies have undergone a rapid evolution and diversification. A multitude of techniques have been developed, optimized, and eventually abandoned when novel and more efficient and/or more reliable methods appeared. Despite some overlap between the lifetimes of the different technologies, three phases can be defined that coincide with major technological advances. Whereas the first phase of DNA fingerprinting (“the past”) was dominated by restriction fragment analysis in conjunction with Southern blot hybridization, the advent of the PCR in the late 1980s gave way to the development of PCR-based single- or multi-locus profiling techniques in the second phase. Given that many routine applications of plant DNA fingerprinting still rely on PCR-based markers, we here refer to these methods as “DNA fingerprinting in the present”, and include numerous examples in the present review. The beginning of the third phase actually dates back to 2005, when several novel, highly parallel DNA sequencing strategies were developed that increased the throughput over current Sanger sequencing technology 1000-fold and more. High-speed DNA sequencing was soon also exploited for DNA fingerprinting in plants, either in terms of facilitated marker development, or directly in the sense of “genotyping-by-sequencing”. Whereas these novel approaches are applied at an ever increasing rate also in non-model species, they are still far from routine, and we therefore treat them here as “DNA fingerprinting in the future”.
机译:大约三十年前,亚历克·杰弗里斯(Alec Jeffreys)发表了有关利用微卫星探针进行人类DNA指纹识别的开创性的《自然》论文(Jeffreys及其同事,《自然》(Nature)1985,314:67-73和《自然》(Nature)1985,316:76-79)。这项新技术很快就被包括植物在内的许多其他生物所采用,当希尔德·尼博姆(Hilde Nybom),库尔特·维辛(Kurt Weising)和亚历克·杰弗里斯(Alec Jeffreys)在1990年于瑞士伯尔尼举行的第一届国际DNA指纹识别国际会议上首次会面时,每个人都对这种新方法充满热情。允许我们首次使用DNA标记物在个人层面上区分人,动物,植物和真菌。发行了名为“指纹新闻”的时事通讯,出售了T恤衫,伯尔尼会议的议事录填满了第一本有关“ DNA指纹:方法和应用”的书。即将举行另外四场会议,每个大陆各一次,当然Alec Jeffreys也应邀参加了所有会议。从这些早期开始,方法学就经历了迅速的发展和多样化。当出现新颖且更有效和/或更可靠的方法时,已经开发,优化并最终放弃了许多技术。尽管不同技术的生命周期有些重叠,但可以定义与主要技术进步相吻合的三个阶段。 DNA指纹图谱的第一阶段(“过去”)主要是通过限制性片段分析和Southern blot杂交相结合,而1980年代后期,PCR的出现让位于基于PCR的单基因座或多基因座的发展第二阶段的性能分析技术。鉴于植物DNA指纹的许多常规应用仍依赖于基于PCR的标记,我们在这里将这些方法称为“目前的DNA指纹”,并在本综述中包括许多示例。第三阶段的开始实际上可以追溯到2005年,当时开发了几种新颖的,高度并行的DNA测序策略,其吞吐能力是当前Sanger测序技术的1000倍甚至更多。高速DNA测序很快也被用于植物的DNA指纹识别,无论是在便利的标记开发方面,还是直接在“测序基因分型”的意义上。尽管这些新颖的方法也越来越多地应用于非模型物种,但它们仍与常规方法相去甚远,因此我们在这里将它们视为“未来的DNA指纹”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号