...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Iranian journal of psychiatry. >Neurocognitive Profile of Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders (ADHD): A comparison between subtypes
【24h】

Neurocognitive Profile of Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders (ADHD): A comparison between subtypes

机译：注意缺陷多动障碍（ADHD）儿童的神经认知特征：亚型之间的比较

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to examine the differences between ADHD subtypes in executive function tasks compared to themselves and normal controls.MethodIn this study, 45 school aged children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and 30 normal children who were matched based on age and IQ score in Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) were compared in terms of executive function. We used Wisconsin Sorting Card Test to assess executive function in both groups. We also used children’s scores in Children Symptom Inventory-4 (CSI-4) for diagnosing ADHD and specifying ADHD subtypes. Data were entered in SPSS-17 and analyzed by T-test and ANOVA static tests to clarify the differences between ADHD and controls and between ADHD subtypes. Scheffe’s test was also used to identify which groups were different from one another. The mean and standard divisions (SD) were used for descriptive analysis.ResultsADHD subtypes are significantly different in terms of perseverative responses (p≤ 0/01) and perseverative errors (p≤ 0/001). Based on Scheffe’s test, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders-Hyperactive type (ADHD-H) is not that different from Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders-Inattention type (ADHD-I) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders-Combined type (ADHD-C), but there are significant responses and perseverative differences between ADHD-I and ADHD-C in terms of perseverative errors. ADHD-C shows more perseverative responses and perseverative errors than ADHD-I.ConclusionThe findings of this study revealed that executive function patterns are different in children with ADHD compared to normal children. In this study it was also found that ADHD subtypes are also different in terms of perseveration and response inhibition domains; ADHD-C has more deficits in these domains.
机译：目的本研究的目的是检查执行功能任务中的ADHD亚型与他们自己和正常对照组之间的差异。方法在本研究中，45名学龄儿童患有注意力缺陷多动障碍（ADHD）和30名年龄正常的正常儿童在执行功能方面比较了韦氏儿童智力量表修订版（WISC-R）中的智商得分和智商得分。我们使用威斯康星州分类卡测试来评估两组的执行功能。我们还使用了儿童症状量表4（CSI-4）中的儿童评分来诊断ADHD并指定ADHD亚型。将数据输入SPSS-17，并通过T检验和ANOVA静态检验进行分析，以阐明ADHD与对照之间以及ADHD亚型之间的差异。 Scheffe的测试还用于确定哪些组彼此不同。结果均值和标准差（SD）用于描述性分析。结果ADHD亚型的持久性反应（p≤0/01）和持久性误差（p≤0/001）显着不同。根据Scheffe的检验，注意力缺陷多动障碍-多动型（ADHD-H）与注意力缺陷多动障碍-注意力不足型（ADHD-I）和注意力缺陷多动障碍-合并型（ADHD-C）并没有什么不同，在持久性错误方面，ADHD-1和ADHD-C之间存在重大反应和持久性差异。结论：ADHD-C比ADHD-I表现出更多的持久性反应和持久性错误。结论这项研究的结果表明，与正常儿童相比，ADHD儿童的执行功能模式有所不同。在这项研究中，还发现ADHD亚型在持久性和反应抑制域方面也有所不同。 ADHD-C在这些方面有更多的缺陷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号