首页> 外文期刊>Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal: Al-Magallat al-Sihhiyyat li-Sarq al-Mutawassit >Biomedical and health research geography in the Eastern Mediterranean Region
【24h】

Biomedical and health research geography in the Eastern Mediterranean Region

机译:东地中海区域的生物医学和卫生研究地理

获取原文
           

摘要

Background : Measuring scientific outputs allows for objective evaluation of established health research systems and ranking countries according to scientific achievements. To our knowledge, attempts for systematic mapping health research output in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR) are limited. Aims : We aimed to conduct a detailed bibliometric analysis of EMR biomedical and health research productivity during the period 2004–2013, considering country of first author. Methods : We applied an improved PubMed search strategy to obtain precise data on EMR research productivity, limiting articles to reviews, original research and case reports. Data were normalized to global research output, represented by total articles indexed in PubMed per year from 2004–2013, according to population size of each country. Second order polynomial trend lines were calculated and comparing 5-year periods: 2004–2008 with 2009–2013. Results : Inspecting overall raw data, a clear increasing trend is observed. Regional share of global health related research ranged from 0.85–2.36% of total PubMed indexed publications during the study period. Five countries contributed to 80% of all published articles during study period; i.e., Islamic Republic of Iran (39%), Egypt (14%), Saudi Arabia (11%), Tunisia, and Pakistan (8% each). Overall, 2.35 articles are published per 100 000 population per year. While Kuwait maintained the highest per capita publication (followed by Tunisia, Lebanon, Qatar and Islamic Republic of Iran), Qatar, Islamic Republic of Iran and Saudi Arabia demonstrated the highest “per capita” population growth in publications. Three academic institutions accounted for over 10% of all publications that were led by an investigator from the Region. Collectively, most prolific 25 EMR institutions published 44% of all published biomedical and health research in the EMR. Conclusions : The overall global share of EMR health research publication is smaller than its global share of population or wealth. Biomedical and health research needs greater encouragement and supporting many EMR countries and/or institutions, especially those found to be least prolific in our analysis. The increase in academic publication on health has been more prominent in a few countries only. It is anticipated that the concentration of biomedical and health research in EMR academic institutions would help in translating knowledge into public health outcomes, if more suitable conditions are provided.
机译:背景:测量科学产出可对建立的卫生研究系统进行客观评估,并根据科学成就对国家进行排名。就我们所知,在东地中海区域(EMR)中系统绘制卫生研究成果的尝试是有限的。目的:考虑到第一作者的国家,我们旨在对EMR生物医学和健康研究的生产率进行详细的文献计量分析。方法:我们应用了一种改进的PubMed搜索策略来获取有关EMR研究生产率的精确数据,将文章限于评论,原始研究和病例报告。根据每个国家的人口规模,将数据标准化为全球研究成果,以2004-2013年间每年发表在PubMed中的总文章数表示。计算了二阶多项式趋势线,并比较了5年期间(2004-2008年与2009-2013年)。结果:检查总体原始数据,观察到明显的增长趋势。在研究期间,全球与健康相关的研究的区域份额为PubMed索引出版物总数的0.85-2.36%。在研究期间,五个国家贡献了所有已发表文章的80%;即伊朗伊斯兰共和国(39%),埃及(14%),沙特阿拉伯(11%),突尼斯和巴基斯坦(各为8%)。总体而言,每年每10万人口发表2.35篇文章。虽然科威特的人均出版物数量最高(其次是突尼斯,黎巴嫩,卡塔尔和伊朗伊斯兰共和国),但卡塔尔,伊朗伊斯兰共和国和沙特阿拉伯的出版物中“人均”人口增长率最高。由该地区的调查员领导的三个学术机构占所有出版物的10%以上。总的来说,最有实力的25个EMR机构发表了EMR中所有已发表的生物医学和健康研究的44%。结论:EMR健康研究出版物的总体全球份额小于其人口或财富的全球份额。生物医学和健康研究需要更大的鼓励并支持许多EMR国家和/或机构,尤其是在我们的分析中发现生产力最低的国家和/或机构。关于健康的学术出版物的增加仅在少数几个国家中更为突出。可以预料,如果提供了更合适的条件,EMR学术机构中生物医学和健康研究的集中将有助于将知识转化为公共卫生成果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号