【24h】

Tort Law and Medical Malpractice Insurance Premiums:

机译:侵权法和医疗事故保险费:

获取原文
           

摘要

This paper estimated the effects of tort law and insurer investment returns on physician malpractice insurance premiums. Data were collected on tort law from 1991 through 2004, and multivariate regression models, including fixed effects for state and year, were used to estimate the effect of changes in tort law on medical malpractice premiums. The premium consequences of national policy changes were simulated. The analysis found that the introduction of a new damage cap lowered malpractice premiums for internal medicine, general surgery, and obstetrics/gynecology by 17.3%, 20.7%, and 25.5%, respectively. Lowering damage caps by $100,000 reduced premiums by 4%. Statutes of repose also resulted in lower premiums. No other tort law changes had the effect of lowering premiums. Simulation results indicate that a national cap of $250,000 on awards for noneconomic damages in all states would imply premium savings of $16.9 billion. Extending a $250,000 cap to all states that do not currently have them would save $1.4 billion annually, or about 8% of the total. A negative effect on malpractice premiums was found for the Dow Jones industrial average, but not for bond prices; effects of the Nasdaq index were not significant for internal medicine, but were marginally significant for surgery and obstetrics premiums.
机译:本文估计了侵权法和保险人投资收益对医生医疗事故保险费的影响。收集了从1991年到2004年的侵权法数据,并使用多元回归模型(包括州和年份的固定影响)来评估侵权法变化对医疗事故保险费的影响。模拟了国家政策变化的额外后果。分析发现,引入新的赔偿上限将内科,普外科和妇产科的医疗事故保费分别降低了17.3%,20.7%和25.5%。将损失限额降低100,000美元,保费降低4%。休养法规也导致保险费降低。没有其他侵权法变更会降低保险费。模拟结果表明,如果将所有国家的非经济损害赔偿上限设为25万美元,则意味着可以节省169亿美元的保费。将25万美元的上限扩大到目前没有这些上限的所有州,每年将节省14亿美元,约占总数的8%。道琼斯工业平均指数对违法溢价产生了负面影响,但对债券价格却没有。纳斯达克指数对内科药物的影响不显着,但对手术和产科保费的影响微乎其微。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号