...
首页> 外文期刊>In die Skriflig >The ‘Frail Researcher’ in dialogue with existential phenomenology: The threat of empiricism within the quest for sound methodology in practical theological research
【24h】

The ‘Frail Researcher’ in dialogue with existential phenomenology: The threat of empiricism within the quest for sound methodology in practical theological research

机译:“脆弱的研究者”与存在的现象学对话:在实践神学研究中寻求合理方法论中的经验主义威胁

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Within an academic environment and context of higher education, the question of disciplinary differentiation and research methodology are burning issues to adhere to the quest for scientific and sound epistemological based knowledge. While dealing with the dual tension: wisdom ( sapientia ) and reason ( scientia ), it is difficult for practical theology to identify and maintain its theological character. Under the pressure of human sciences, research in practical theology tends to turn to phenomenology so to gain clarity on the philosophical framework or paradigm for performing research projects in a systematic and methodological way. In this regard, existential phenomenology probes into the meta-realm of meaning-giving; it describes the frailty of life in terms of being (Dasein) as exposed to anxiety, dread, despair and fear of death. Due to the demand for empirical research, the threat of empiricism and the danger of Platonification (the ‘causation trap’) is discussed. To maintain both its spiritual-theological character (ministerial and ecclesial context), and its relevancy for the dynamics of life events (contextuality), a ‘spiritual empiricism’ is proposed by means of a praxis of practical theological verbing, namely understanding and interpreting, communicating and verbalising, acting, hoping, imagining, seeing, beautifying and living. It is argued that the notion ‘praxis of God’ could serve as theological paradigm in theory formation. The? passio Dei ?is both a spiritual matter and existential-experiential entity within the encounter of God–human beings. It refers to both the reason or logic of God ( ?esed ) and the wisdom of grace (compassion).
机译:在学术环境和高等教育背景下,学科差异和研究方法论的问题成为紧迫的问题,以坚持对基于科学和可靠的认识论的知识的追求。在处理双重张力:智慧(sapientia)和理性(scientia)时,实践神学很难识别并保持其神学特征。在人类科学的压力下,实用神学的研究趋向于现象学,以使人们有条理地理解以系统和方法论的方式执行研究项目的哲学框架或范式。在这方面,存在的现象学探究了赋予意义的元境。它以(Dasein)遭受焦虑,恐惧,绝望和对死亡的恐惧来描述生活的脆弱。由于需要进行实证研究,因此讨论了经验主义的威胁和质子化的危险(“因果陷阱”)。为了既保持其精神神学特征(部长和教会的背景),又保持其与生活事件动力学的相关性(上下文),通过实践神学动词的实践,即理解和解释,提出了“精神经验主义”,沟通和口头表达,表演,希望,想象,看到,美化和生活。有人认为“上帝的实践”可以作为理论形成的神学范式。该? passio Dei是神与人相遇中的属灵物质和存在-体验实体。它既指上帝的理性或逻辑(“奉献”)又指恩典的智慧(同情)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号