• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environment and Ecology Research >The Pollutant Spreading Model AUSTAL 2000 Is Not Validated
【24h】

The Pollutant Spreading Model AUSTAL 2000 Is Not Validated

机译：未验证污染物扩散模型AUSTAL 2000

获取原文
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

With individual examples [1 to 4] Schenk has demonstrated for AUSTAL2000 that the II. Law of Thermodynamics and the mass conservation law are violated. In [5] Truckenmüller et. 13 alii one contradicts and explains that AUSTAL is verified and validated yet. However, it turns out that there is a trivial solution in the posted derivation of the reference solution. It will be noted that this solution is not usable and performs speculative deposition rates and thus hurts the balancing differential equation. The correct nontrivial solution, which is suitable for the description of deposition and sedimentation are given in this paper. Beyond the generality of the earlier objections raised against AUSTAL occupied by valid integral theorems. They are not restricted to individual cases. Homogeneity tests turn out to be useless trivial cases and are not suitable for validation. For identical tasks, different solutions are given and direct users astray. It is claimed to have taken into account sources at 200m height, but the simulation results do not show the effect of high altitude sources. Criticizable terminology shows that the authors of AUSTAL have little busy with the basics of momentum, heat and mass transfer laws. In the context of other inconsistencies, the author concludes that the grounds given by Janicke & Janicke tests to sedimentation and deposition uniformity and could not have taken place. The life story of AUSTAL 2000 begins in 1984 with a fatal error and via LASAT to AUSTAL. She has found in 2016 a temporary end with an unprecedented sleight of hand. Mathematics and mechanics are used as valid tools of an incorruptible evidence.
机译：Schenk通过示例[1至4]为AUSTAL2000演示了II。违反了热力学定律和质量守恒定律。在[5]Truckenmüller等。 13所有矛盾并解释说AUSTAL已经过验证。但是，事实证明，在参考解决方案的发布派生中有一个简单的解决方案。将会注意到，该解决方案不可用，并且执行推测性沉积速率，因此损害了平衡微分方程。给出了适用于沉积和沉积描述的正确的非平凡解。有效的积分定理超越了对AUSTAL提出的早期反对意见的一般性。它们不限于个别情况。同质性测试证明是无用的琐碎情况，不适合进行验证。对于相同的任务，给出了不同的解决方案并使直接用户误入歧途。据称已考虑到200m高处的震源，但模拟结果并未显示出高海拔震源的影响。可批判性的术语表明，AUSTAL的作者对动量，热和质量传递定律的基本知识并不忙。在其他不一致的情况下，作者得出结论，Janicke和Janicke测试给出的沉积和沉积均匀性的依据是不可能发生的。 AUSTAL 2000的人生故事始于1984年，当时发生致命错误，并通过LASAT到达AUSTAL。她在2016年发现了一个空前绝技的临时结局。数学和力学被用作廉洁证据的有效工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号