首页> 外文期刊>Ethics in science and environmental politics >Re-interpretation of ‘influence weight’ as a citation-based Index of New Knowledge (INK)
【24h】

Re-interpretation of ‘influence weight’ as a citation-based Index of New Knowledge (INK)

机译:重新解释“影响力权重”作为基于引用的新知识索引(INK)

获取原文
           

摘要

ABSTRACT: A method proposed in 1976 by F. Narin and collaborators for assessing the ‘influence weight’ of journals is re-interpreted as a potential citation-based indicator of the impact of scientific and other publications which would allow for comparisons between publication types (e.g. regular articles, notes, books) and disciplines, whose practitioners typically exhibit radically different citation behaviors. This Index of New Knowledge (INK) is a dimensionless fraction, with the number of references in the paper to be evaluated + 1 as the denominator, and the number of citations accumulated during a certain period after publication as the numerator. Application examples are provided, covering different disciplines, and the pros and cons of INK are discussed and contrasted with the widely-used journal impact factor.
机译:摘要:F. Narin和合作者于1976年提出的一种评估期刊“影响力”的方法被重新解释为一种潜在的基于引文的科学和其他出版物影响的指标,该方法可用于对出版物类型进行比较(例如常规文章,笔记,书籍)和学科,其从业人员通常表现出截然不同的引用行为。该新知识索引(INK)是一个无量纲的分数,其中要评估的论文参考数量+ 1作为分母,并且在出版后的一定时间内累积的引用数量作为分子。提供了涵盖不同学科的应用示例,并讨论了INK的优缺点,并与广泛使用的期刊影响因子进行了对比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号