• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Ethics in science and environmental politics >Lost in publication: how measurement harms science
【24h】

Lost in publication: how measurement harms science

机译：遗失在出版物中：测量如何损害科学

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

ABSTRACT: Measurement of scientific productivity is difficult. The measures used (impact factor of the journal, citations to the paper being measured) are crude. But these measures are now so universally adopted that they determine most things that matter: tenure or unemployment, a postdoctoral grant or none, success or failure. As a result, scientists have been forced to downgrade their primary aim from making discoveries to publishing as many papers as possible—and trying to work them into high impact factor journals. Consequently, scientific behaviour has become distorted and the utility, quality and objectivity of articles has deteriorated. Changes to the way scientists are assessed are urgently needed, and I suggest some here.
机译：摘要：科学生产率的测量是困难的。所使用的度量（期刊的影响因子，对所引用论文的引用）是粗略的。但是，现在这些措施已被普遍采用，以至于它们决定了大多数重要的事情：任期或失业，博士后补助金或无，成功或失败。结果，科学家被迫将其主要目标从发现转变为发表尽可能多的论文，并试图将其纳入高影响因子期刊。结果，科学行为变得失真，并且物品的实用性，质量和客观性恶化。迫切需要改变科学家的评估方式，我在这里提出一些建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号