首页> 外文期刊>Ethics in science and environmental politics >Which came first: the money or the rank?
【24h】

Which came first: the money or the rank?

机译:首先是钱还是等级?

获取原文
           

摘要

ABSTRACT: Global university rankings are provided by several organisations based on various criteria, most of which are, directly or indirectly, related to the wealth of the university. The main objective of this work was to examine the effect of money on rankings and vice versa. First, we examined the relationship between global university rankings and professors’ salaries and found an asymptotic trend for all ranks of professors across the top 200 US universities, but no trend for the top Canadian universities. Second, we examined the relationship between global university rankings and university income and found a positive trend for UK and Canadian universities. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that the funding (as well as autonomy and support of the state) of a university and its position in global rankings are related. We maintain that European universities in several countries will not make it into the top 100 list unless their autonomy and public funding are increased. Instead, the recent decrease in public funding of universities in many European countries, as a result of the economic crisis, threatens to push these institutions further down the ranking lists.
机译:摘要:全球大学排名是由多个组织根据各种标准提供的,其中大多数直接或间接地与大学的财富有关。这项工作的主要目的是检验金钱对排名的影响,反之亦然。首先,我们研究了全球大学排名与教授薪水之间的关系,发现美国排名前200位的大学中所有教授排名的渐近趋势,而加拿大排名前列的大学则没有趋势。其次,我们研究了全球大学排名与大学收入之间的关系,发现英国和加拿大大学的发展趋势是积极的。我们的结果与以下假设一致:大学的资金(以及国家的自治权和支持)与其在全球排名中的地位相关。我们坚持认为,除非增加其自主性和公共资金,否则多个国家的欧洲大学不会进入前100名。取而代之的是,由于经济危机,欧洲许多国家最近对大学的公共资助减少了,这有可能使这些院校进一步跌入排行榜。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号