...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Evidence >Does the effectiveness of forest protected areas differ conditionally on their type of governance?
【24h】

Does the effectiveness of forest protected areas differ conditionally on their type of governance?

机译：森林保护区的有效性在其治理类型上是否有条件不同？

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

BackgroundIn context of protected areas (PAs), governance can be defined as a set of processes, procedures, resources, institutions and actors that determine how decisions are made and implemented. Current governance modes of forest PAs are multilevel and complex, with a variety of actors, different levels of power sharing, various formal and informal rules and vested interests. However, there is no systematic information on how different local governance modes and day-to-day decision-making processes within forest PAs may cause a change in PA effectiveness in terms of producing desired conservation outcomes. In this review we aim to assess relative effectiveness of forest PAs worldwide with respect to different governance modes and linking them to the multiple outcomes in order to discern the effective governance strategies for biodiversity and forest conservation. We will evaluate effectiveness of forest protected areas by multiple outcome measures: 1) attitudes of local stakeholders towards forest protected area governance, 2) conservation-related behaviour of local stakeholders, 3) ecological parameters such as forest cover, biodiversity level, density, overall forest condition and/or health as well as 4) existence of local spillover effects defined as social, institutional and ecological effects in surrounding social-ecological systems.MethodsTo gather empirical evidence on the effectiveness and outcomes of different governance arrangements of forest protected areas, we will search electronic databases, organizational websites, use web search engines and perform a bibliographic search. Articles will be filtered by title, abstract and full text. To facilitate understanding of predictors and conditions for effective PAs, both qualitative and quantitative data from the relevant studies will be extracted and integrated. Multivariate statistical analyses will be performed to give insights into association between different governance modes, their characteristics and PA effectiveness. Finally, the review will report on data gaps and potential for future empirical research.
机译：背景技术在保护区（PA）的背景下，治理可以定义为一组决定如何制定和实施决策的过程，程序，资源，机构和参与者。当前森林保护区的治理模式是多层次且复杂的，具有各种参与者，不同级别的权力共享，各种正式和非正式规则以及既得利益。但是，没有关于森林保护区中不同的地方治理模式和日常决策过程如何导致保护区有效性在产生所需保护成果方面发生变化的系统信息。在这篇综述中，我们旨在评估全球森林保护区在不同治理模式方面的相对有效性，并将它们与多种结果联系起来，以识别生物多样性和森林保护的有效治理策略。我们将通过多种结果评估措施来评估森林保护区的有效性：1）地方利益相关者对森林保护区治理的态度; 2）地方利益相关者与保护相关的行为; 3）生态参数，例如森林覆盖率，生物多样性水平，密度，总体森林状况和/或健康，以及4）在周围的社会生态系统中存在局部溢出效应，即社会，制度和生态效应。方法为了收集关于森林保护区不同治理安排的有效性和结果的经验证据，我们将搜索电子数据库，组织网站，使用网络搜索引擎并执行书目搜索。文章将按标题，摘要和全文过滤。为了促进对有效PA的预测因素和条件的理解，将提取和整合相关研究的定性和定量数据。将进行多变量统计分析，以深入了解不同治理模式之间的关联，其特征和PA有效性。最后，审查将报告数据差距和未来实证研究的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号