...
首页> 外文期刊>ERCIM News >On the Conferences vs. Journals Controversy
【24h】

On the Conferences vs. Journals Controversy

机译:关于会议与期刊之争

获取原文
           

摘要

Conferences are harmful for research evaluation.The document [1] addresses the critical issue of informatics research evaluation in a complete and thorough way, touching all the main facets of the problem. I substantially agree with most of the arguments and proposals presented therein. In this note, however, I discuss the only point of serious disagreement, i.e., the role assigned to conferences for the evaluation of research in computer science. I admit that it is a fact that in our community – probably the only scientific community that exhibits this specificity – conferences often overwhelm journals in the research assessment procedure, but I believe that this anomaly is seriously flawed, dangerous, and should be contrasted – not be accepted or, even worse, encouraged.
机译:会议对研究评估有害。文件[1]全面,彻底地解决了信息学研究评估的关键问题,涉及了该问题的所有主要方面。我基本上同意其中提出的大多数论点和建议。但是,在本说明中,我讨论了严重分歧的唯一点,即分配给会议以评估计算机科学研究的作用。我承认,事实上,在我们的社区(可能是唯一展现出这种特异性的科学社区)中,会议常常使研究评估程序中的期刊不知所措,但是我认为这种异常存在严重的缺陷,危险,应该加以对比。被接受,或者甚至更令人鼓舞。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号