...
首页> 外文期刊>European Clinical Respiratory Journal >Ergospirometry with concurrent fibre optic laryngoscopy: a randomised crossover study
【24h】

Ergospirometry with concurrent fibre optic laryngoscopy: a randomised crossover study

机译:并发光纤喉镜的人体工学测定法:一项随机交叉研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Patients suffering from exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO) are subjected to several exhausting tests. We aimed to assess the feasibility of using a single test to obtain diagnostic measurements for maximum oxygen uptake (VO_(2)max) and exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO).Methods: Patients referred to the outpatient respiratory clinic at the University Hospital of Bispebjerg, Copenhagen with exercise-induced dyspnoea were evaluated for inclusion over 13?months. Eligible patients were aged 18–43?years, had a known EILO diagnosis (moderate or severe) and were inactive (self-reported activity) with less than 3?hours activity per week. In randomised order, all participants (n? =?11) underwent three tests: a VO_(2)max test with and without concurrent laryngoscopy. VO_(2)max and EILO values from the two testing methods were compared.Findings: There was no difference in VO_(2)max measured by ergospirometry with and without simultaneous continuous laryngoscopy during exercise (CLE) testing (mean difference ?22?ml O_(2)?min~(?1); 95% CI ?125 to 81?ml O_(2)?min~(?1); P? =?0.647). EILO scores obtained during the CLE testing on the treadmill versus CLE testing on the ergometer bike revealed identical supraglottic scores in nine of the 11 participants (82%) with substantial agreement between the two types of test (x ?=?0.71). Glottic scores were identical in six of the 11 (55%), showing moderate agreement between test types (x ?=?0.38).Conclusions: Based on our findings in inactive individuals, ergospirometry with laryngoscopy is feasible and well tolerated, yielding measurements for maximal oxygen uptake comparable to those of standard bike ergospirometry. Likewise, measurements of supraglottic EILO are comparable to those of the standard treadmill CLE test.
机译:背景:患有运动诱发性喉阻塞(EILO)的患者要接受数次疲劳测试。我们旨在评估使用单项测试获得最大摄氧量(VO_(2)max)和运动诱发的喉梗阻(EILO)的诊断性测量的可行性。哥本哈根Bispebjerg患有运动性呼吸困难的情况被评估为13个月以上。符合条件的患者年龄为18-43岁,具有已知的EILO诊断(中度或重度),并且不活跃(自我报告的活动),每周活动少于3小时。以随机顺序,所有参与者(n≥11)接受三项测试:VO_(2)max测试(有或没有并发喉镜检查)。比较了两种测试方法的VO_(2)max和EILO值。结果:在进行运动(CLE)测试时,同时进行和不进行连续喉镜检查的情况下,通过人体工程肺量计测得的VO_(2)max均无差异(平均差异为22 ml)。 O_(2)·min·(θ1); 95%CI≤125至81μmlO_(2)·min·(θ1); Pi = 0.647。在跑步机上进行CLE测试与在测功机上进行CLE测试期间获得的EILO分数显示11名参与者中的9名参与者(82%)的声门上分数相同,并且两种测试类型之间的一致性很高( = 0.71)。 。在11个样本中有6个样本的声门得分相同(55%),表明测试类型之间存在中等程度的一致性(?=?0.38)。结论:根据我们在非活动个体中的发现,使用喉镜进行人体工程肺量计是可行且耐受性良好的,产生的最大摄氧量测量值可与标准自行车人体工学测量法相比。同样,声门上EILO的测量值可与标准跑步机CLE测试的测量值相媲美。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号