...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of General Medicine >Explaining the process of choosing clinical specialties in general medical graduates: A grounded theory
【24h】

Explaining the process of choosing clinical specialties in general medical graduates: A grounded theory

机译:解释普通医学专业毕业生选择临床专业的过程:扎根理论

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: Internationally, the distribution of specialized physicians is a growing concern. The choice of medical specialties is a central issue in attempts to change this problematic situation. The current study aimed to explain the process of choosing clinical specialties in Iran’s medical graduates. Materials and Methods: The authors used grounded theory methodology. In 2016-2017, they conducted 14 in-depth, face-to-face, semi structured interviews with a purposive and theoretical sample of 10 medical graduates based on two criteria (those who intended to participate in the medical assistant exam and those who participated in the exam and their test scores had not yet been announced). Results: After analysis of the interviews, 883 primary codes, 64 subcategories, 14 subclasses, and 4 main categories were obtained. The results of data collection and analysis at four levels by Strauss and Corbin (2008), which led to the theory and model in this field, showed the effectiveness of the process of choosing specialty results from the coordination between three dimensions of study, career, and favorable conditions imagined for the future life that takes place in a supportive environment with a developed welfare system and an inclusive academic culture. Conclusion: With the help of the findings of such a study, the process and the main elements involved in this process can be determined and the causal relationships and mechanisms can be identified and intervened, which in turn leads to choosing medical specialty in line with the national priorities.
机译:目的:在国际上,专业医生的分布日益受到关注。医学专业的选择是试图改变这种有问题状况的中心问题。目前的研究旨在解释伊朗医学毕业生选择临床专业的过程。材料和方法:作者使用扎根理论方法。在2016-2017年期间,他们基于两个标准(打算参加医学助理考试的人和参加过医疗助理考试的人),对10位医学专业毕业生进行了有目的和理论性的抽样调查,共进行了14次深入,面对面,半结构化的访谈考试中尚未公布他们的考试成绩)。结果:在对访谈进行分析之后,获得了883个主要代码,64个子类别,14个子类别和4个主要类别。 Strauss和Corbin(2008)在四个层次上进行数据收集和分析的结果引出了该领域的理论和模型,显示了从研究,职业,以及在发达的福利体系和包容性学术文化的支持环境中为未来生活设想的有利条件。结论:借助这项研究的结果,可以确定过程和过程中涉及的主要因素,并确定和干预因果关系和机制,从而导致选择符合医学要求的医学专业。国家优先事项。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号