...
首页> 外文期刊>Environments >Application of GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Technique in Exploration of Suitable Site Options for Anaerobic Digestion of Food and Biodegradable Waste in Oita City, Japan
【24h】

Application of GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Technique in Exploration of Suitable Site Options for Anaerobic Digestion of Food and Biodegradable Waste in Oita City, Japan

机译:基于GIS的多标准决策技术在日本大分市厌氧消化食品和可生物降解废物的合适场地选择中的应用

获取原文
           

摘要

Recently, the popularity of anaerobic digestion (AD) has been increasing, and selecting a site for AD is a complex process for both individuals and decision-makers. This process requires the selected site to fulfill all regulation requirements, simultaneously reducing environmental, sociocultural, technical, political, economic, and public health costs. A geographic-information-system-based multi-criteria decision analysis (GIS-MCDA) is presented in this study to evaluate and examine the suitability of the study area in order to propose a suitable site for an AD facility in Oita City, Japan. Multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) was used to standardize the map layers into fuzzy membership functions. The proximity variables were classified into seven factors and three constraint groups, specifically, environmental, sociocultural, and technical/economic criteria. The proximity and criteria maps were combined using weighted linear combination (WLC) techniques, and the resulting suitability map was evaluated on a grading scale of 0–255 B. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) ranking analysis indicated that an area of about 13.36 km 2 from the entire study area is the most suitable and that the remaining two options are still suitable for the intended purpose, but the entire decision will be entrusted to the decision-makers’ judgment.
机译:近来,厌氧消化(AD)的普及程度不断提高,而选择AD的场所对个人和决策者而言都是一个复杂的过程。此过程要求选定的站点满足所有法规要求,同时减少环境,社会文化,技术,政治,经济和公共卫生成本。本研究提出了一种基于地理信息系统的多准则决策分析(GIS-MCDA),以评估和检查研究区域的适用性,从而为日本大分市的AD设施提供合适的场所。多标准评估(MCE)用于将地图图层标准化为模糊隶属函数。邻近变量分为七个因素和三个约束组,分别是环境,社会文化和技术/经济标准。使用加权线性组合(WLC)技术将邻近图和标准图进行组合,并在0-255 B的等级范围内评估所得的适用性图。分析层次过程(AHP)等级分析表明,该区域约13.36 km整个研究领域中的2是最合适的,其余两个选项仍然适合预期的目的,但是整个决策将由决策者做出判断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号