...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Geosciences >Comparison Study to the Use of Geophysical Methods at Archaeological Sites Observed by Various Remote Sensing Techniques in the Czech Republic
【24h】

Comparison Study to the Use of Geophysical Methods at Archaeological Sites Observed by Various Remote Sensing Techniques in the Czech Republic

机译：捷克共和国各种遥感技术在考古现场使用地球物理方法的比较研究

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A combination of geophysical methods could be very a useful and a practical way of verifying the origin and precise localisation of archaeological situations identified by different remote sensing techniques. The results of different methods (and scales) of monitoring these fully non-destructive methods provide distinct data and often complement each other. The presented examples of combinations of these methods/techniques in this study (aerial survey, LIDAR-ALS and surface magnetometer or resistivity survey) could provide information on some specifics and may also be limitations in surveying different archaeological terrains, types of archaeological situations and activities. The archaeological site in this contribution is considered to be a material of this study. In case of Neolithic ditch enclosure near Kolín were compared aerial prospection data, magnetometer survey and aerial photo-documentation of excavated site. In the case of hillforts near Levousy we compared LIDAR data with aerial photography and large-scale magnetometer survey. In the case of the medieval castle Liběhrad we compared LIDAR data with geoelectric resistivity measurement. In case of a burial mound cemetery we combined LIDAR data with magnetometer survey. In the case of the production area near Rynartice we combined LIDAR data with magnetometer and resistivity measurements and result of archaeological excavation. Fortunately for successful combination of geophysical and remote sensing results, their conditions and factors for efficient use in archaeology are not the same. On the other hand, the quality and state of many prehistoric, early medieval, medieval and also modern archaeological sites is rapidly changing over time and both groups of techniques represent important support for their comprehensive and precise documentation and protection.
机译：结合地球物理方法可能是一种非常有用且实用的方式，可以通过不同的遥感技术来验证考古情况的起源和精确定位。监视这些完全非破坏性方法的不同方法（和规模）的结果提供了不同的数据，并且常常相互补充。本研究中这些方法/技术的组合示例（航空调查，LIDAR-ALS和表面磁力计或电阻率调查）可能提供一些特定信息，也可能在调查不同的考古地形，考古情况和活动​​类型方面存在局限性。这种贡献的考古现场被认为是这项研究的材料。如果对科林附近的新石器时代的沟渠围墙进行了比较，则对空中勘测数据，磁力计调查和开挖地点的空中照片进行了比较。在利沃斯附近的山坡地带的情况下，我们将LIDAR数据与航空摄影和大型磁力计调查进行了比较。在中世纪城堡里贝哈拉德的情况下，我们将LIDAR数据与地电阻率测量进行了比较。如果是墓地，我们将LIDAR数据与磁力计结合在一起。在Rynartice附近的生产区域，我们将LIDAR数据与磁力计和电阻率测量值结合在一起，并结合了考古发掘的结果。幸运的是，成功地结合了地球物理和遥感结果，它们在考古学中有效使用的条件和因素并不相同。另一方面，随着时间的流逝，许多史前，中世纪早期，中世纪以及现代考古遗址的质量和状态都在迅速变化，而这两组技术为其全面而精确的记录和保护提供了重要的支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号