...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Global Ecology and Conservation >The comparison of shape indices and perimeter interface of selected protected areas especially with reference to Sariska Tiger Reserve, India
【24h】

The comparison of shape indices and perimeter interface of selected protected areas especially with reference to Sariska Tiger Reserve, India

机译：比较选定保护区的形状指数和周边界面，尤其是参考印度Sariska Tiger保护区

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The extent of interface between wilderness and human dominated landscape is one of many factors that determine the disturbance intensity endured by the biological diversity of any particular area. The intensity of human-wildlife conflict is the secondary outcome of that interface. Perimeter interface per unit area (PIPUA) of any reserve or protected area (PA) can be defined as the ratio of length of the interface of wilderness area and human dominated landscape on the perimeter, to the total area of the PA or reserve. The comparison of Sariska tiger reserve with other tiger reserves across the nation reveals a very high PIPUA index responsible for very high anthropogenic pressures on the biological diversity of this landscape. There should be some sort of minimum PIPUA while notifying any landscape as a protected area. The excess PIPUA of any protected area can only be minimized by relocating or displacing the villages from the protected areas and/or by creating a fence at the interface thus making conditions for inviolate space.
机译：荒野和人类主导的景观之间的界面程度是决定任何特定区域的生物多样性所承受的干扰强度的众多因素之一。人类与野生动物冲突的激烈程度是这种相互作用的次要结果。任何保护区或保护区（PA）的每单位面积的周界界面（PIPUA）可以定义为旷野和人为主导景观在周界上的界面长度与PA或保护区总面积的比值。 Sariska老虎保护区与全国其他老虎保护区的比较显示，PIPUA指数非常高，导致该景观的生物多样性受到很高的人为压力。在通知任何景观为保护区时，应该有某种最低限度的PIPUA。任何村庄的多余PIPUA只能通过将村庄从保护区重新安置或撤离和/或通过在界面处设置围栏来最小化，从而为空间的扩大创造条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号