...
首页> 外文期刊>Fisioterapia em Movimento >Valida??o da vers?o brasileira de WHODAS 2.0 em pacientes em hemodiáliseValidación de la versión brasile?a de WHODAS 2.0 en pacientes en terapia de hemodiálisis
【24h】

Valida??o da vers?o brasileira de WHODAS 2.0 em pacientes em hemodiáliseValidación de la versión brasile?a de WHODAS 2.0 en pacientes en terapia de hemodiálisis

机译:血液透析患者的巴西版本WHODAS 2.0的验证血液透析患者的巴西版本WHODAS 2.0的验证

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Chronic kidney disease and hemodialysis normally have an impact on the functioning. Objective: To validate the Brazilian version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in individuals with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis treatment. Methods: The 36-item version was applied to interview 51 individuals with chronic kidney disease undergoing dialysis treatment. To ascertain the instrument’s applicability, its internal consistency and test-retest stability were studied. To check the validity, a convergent/divergent analysis was performed. Results: The participants answered the questions on the main instrument at two timepoints and on the World Health Organization Quality of Life Abbreviated instrument and the Kidney Disease Quality of Life - Short FormTM 1.3 once each. Cronbach’s α coefficient was appropriate in all domains except the “Getting along” domain. The test-retest coefficients were above the recommended value ( 0.70). Convergent and divergent validity analysis also showed consistent results by correlation coefficient assessment. Conclusion: The instrument is valid and reliable. This study supports the use of the questionnaire by presenting its appropriate psychometric properties. We suggest that some care should be taken specifically in the sexual questions of the “Getting along” domain.
机译:简介:慢性肾脏疾病和血液透析通常会对功能产生影响。目的:在接受血液透析治疗的慢性肾脏病患者中,验证巴西版本的《世界卫生组织残疾评估表2.0》。方法:采用36个项目的版本,对51名接受透析治疗的慢性肾脏病患者进行访谈。为了确定该仪器的适用性,研究了其内部一致性和重测稳定性。为了检查有效性,进行了收敛/发散分析。结果:参与者分别在两个时间点回答了有关主要仪器的问题,以及有关世界卫生组织的生活质量简化仪器和肾脏疾病生活质量-简表TM 1.3的问题,每次均回答了一次。克朗巴赫(Cronbach)的α系数适用于除“相处”域以外的所有域。重测系数高于建议值(> 0.70)。通过相关系数评估,收敛性和发散性有效性分析也显示出一致的结果。结论:该仪器有效可靠。这项研究通过展示其适当的心理计量学特征来支持问卷的使用。我们建议应特别注意“相处”领域的性问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号