...
首页> 外文期刊>Evidence Based Library and Information Practice >Relevancy Trumps Format When Teaching Information Literacy
【24h】

Relevancy Trumps Format When Teaching Information Literacy

机译:教学信息素养时的相关性特朗普格式

获取原文
           

摘要

A Review of: Tewell, E. C. (2014). Tying television comedies to information literacy: A mixed-methods investigation. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(2), 134-141. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2014.02.004 Objective – This study assessed the effects of showing television comedy clips to demonstrate information literacy concepts when teaching one-shot instruction sessions. More specifically, it examined whether the students’ retention and understanding increased when television comedy clips were used and whether students preferred instruction that included popular culture examples. Design – A mixed-methods investigation that employed multiple-choice questionnaires and focus group interviews. Setting – A small liberal arts college in the United States of America. Subjects – A total of 211 freshmen students enrolled in a First-Year Studies course. The students were divided into 16 class sections. The author collected a total of 193 valid responses to the pretests and posttests in his study. Methods – Half of the class sections (103 respondents) were taught selected information literacy concepts using television comedy clips and a group discussion led by the instructor. The other half (90 respondents) were taught using only an instructor-led discussion. The classes were randomly selected to belong to the experimental group (with TV comedy clips) or the control group (without TV comedy clips). An online pretest questionnaire, consisting of 10 multiple-choice questions, was administered at the beginning of the 90-minute library instruction session for both groups. An online posttest questionnaire, consisting of the same questions as the pretest but in a randomized order, was completed by the students at the end of the session. About a month later, one-hour focus group interviews were conducted with a small subset of the study’s subjects who volunteered to participate in the focus groups. The experimental focus group consisted of five study participants who had attended a library instruction session that involved showing the television comedy clips and the control focus group consisted of six study participants who had attended a library instruction session that did not include showing the television comedy clips. Main Results – The experimental group scored higher than the control group on the posttest with an average “increase of 1.07 points from pre- to posttest compared to a 0.13 mean increase in the control group” (p. 139), which means that the experimental group answered one more question correctly. Four out of the five participants in the experimental focus group also discussed the television comedy clips even though they were not asked about them. Conversely, when asked about what they enjoyed in the class, the majority of participants from both focus groups discussed the content covered in the session rather than any teaching methods employed. “The quantitative results suggest that student test results either increased, as in the experimental group, or remained relatively level, as in the control group, due to the type of instruction received” (p. 137). Conclusion – The author states that the results from the test questionnaires and answers from focus group sessions indicate that using television comedy clips may be a successful way of improving students’ retention of course content. However, the study’s results could not demonstrate that students liked classes with popular culture examples more than classes without them, since the majority of focus group participants found the course content more interesting than the manner in which the content was taught. The relevancy of the content presented in an information literacy session appears to make more of an impact on the students than the format in which it is presented.
机译:评论:Tewell,E. C.(2014)。将电视喜剧与信息素养联系起来:混合方法调查。大学图书馆学报,40(2),134-141。 doi:10.1016 / j.acalib.2014.02.004目标–这项研究评估了电视喜剧剪辑的展示效果,以展示一次性教学课程中的信息素养概念。更具体地说,它研究了使用电视喜剧片段时,学生的保留和理解是否增加,以及学生是否偏爱包含流行文化实例的教学。设计–混合方法调查,采用多项选择调查表和焦点小组访谈。背景-美国一所小型文理学院。科目–共有211名新生入读了第一年课程。这些学生分为16个班级。作者总共收集了193个针对他的研究中的前测和后测的有效答案。方法–一半的班级部分(103名受访者)通过电视喜剧剪辑和由讲师主持的小组讨论,学习了选择的信息素养概念。另一半(90名受访者)仅通过讲师指导的讨论来授课。这些类别是随机选择的,属于实验组(带有电视喜剧剪辑)或对照组(没有电视喜剧剪辑)。两组在90分钟的图书馆教学会议开始时,都进行了包含10个多项选择题的在线预测问卷。在课程结束时,学生完成了一个在线的后测问卷,该问卷由与前测相同的问题组成,但以随机顺序排列。大约一个月后,对自愿参加焦点小组研究的一小部分受试者进行了一个小时的焦点小组访谈。实验焦点小组由五名参加过图书馆教学会议的研究参与者组成,其中包括展示电视喜剧剪辑,而对照组焦点小组由六名参加过图书馆教学会议但不包括展示电视喜剧剪辑的研究参与者组成。主要结果–实验组在测试后的得分高于对照组,平均“测试前到测试后提高了1.07分,而对照组平均提高了0.13分”(第139页),这意味着实验组小组又回答了一个问题。实验焦点小组的五名参与者中有四名也讨论了电视喜剧片段,即使没有被问到。相反,当被问及他们在课堂上的享受时,来自两个焦点小组的大多数参与者讨论了课程所涵盖的内容,而不是所采用的任何教学方法。 “定量结果表明,由于所接受的教学类型,学生测试结果要么增加,如实验组,要么保持相对水平,如对照组”(第137页)。结论–作者指出,测试问卷的结果和焦点小组会议的答案表明,使用电视喜剧片段可能是提高学生对课程内容的保留的成功方法。但是,这项研究的结果不能证明,与没有流行文化实例的班级相比,学生更喜欢具有流行文化实例的班级,因为大多数焦点小组参与者发现课程内容比授课方式更有趣。信息素养课程中呈现的内容的相关性似乎比呈现形式更能对学生产生影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利