...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Forest Research Papers >Why do foresters oppose the enlargement of the Bia?owie?a National Park? The motivation of the State Forests Holding employees as perceived by social actors engaged in the conflict over the Bia?owie?a Forest
【24h】

Why do foresters oppose the enlargement of the Bia?owie?a National Park? The motivation of the State Forests Holding employees as perceived by social actors engaged in the conflict over the Bia?owie?a Forest

机译：为何林民反对国家公园Bia？owie的扩建？参与Bia？owie？a森林冲突的社会行为者认为，国有森林控股公司员工的动机

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study outlines the main motives of foresters opposing the enlargement of the Bia?owie?a National Park to include areas managed by the State Forests Holding. The motives were identified using discourse analysis tools based on the semistructured interviews with 36 people representing various groups of actors engaged in the discussion on the management of the Bia?owie?a Forest. The main motives I found are connected to: (1) a vision of how nature should be and the foresters’ mission; (2) fear of losing employment or getting a worse job; (3) the high esteem of the forester profession in local communities and an inferior vocational status of the national park employees; (4) defending the professional prestige of foresters and the State Forests Holding; (5) competition with national parks over natural areas; (6) forest science; (7) the wish to continue hunting in the Bia?owie?a Forest; (8) bottom-up pressure on the State Forests Holding employees. The major conflict potential in the discourse around the Bia?owie?a Forest is connected with the perception of its unique natural values and methods of protection. As a result, two opposing coalitions have formed: one supporting forestry interests and one encouraging conservation. The discourse of the forestry-supporting coalition is strengthened by an epistemic community of forest scientists. Some arguments presented by the foresters pushing for a continuation of forest management in Bia?owie?a also indicate the involvement of path dependency, which, in combination with large differences between the coalitions, does not allow for optimism regarding the resolution of the conflict.
机译：这项研究概述了林农反对扩大比亚沃维耶国家公园到包括国家森林控股公司管理的地区在内的主要动机。使用话语分析工具根据半结构化访谈对动机进行了识别，该访谈对36名代表参与Bia？owie？a森林管理的各种参与者的人员进行了半结构化访谈。我发现的主要动机与以下方面有关：（1）关于自然应该如何以及林务员的使命的愿景; （2）害怕失业或工作恶化; （3）当地社区对林业工作者的高度重视，国家公园从业人员的职业地位次低; （四）捍卫森林专业人士和国家森林控股的信誉; （五）与国家公园自然保护区竞争; （6）森林科学; （7）希望继续在比亚瓦维耶森林中狩猎; （8）自下而上的压力对国家森林控股的员工造成了压力。围绕比亚沃维耶阿森林的论述中主要的潜在冲突与对其独特的自然价值和保护方法的认识有关。结果，形成了两个对立的联盟：一个支持林业利益，一个鼓励环境保护。由森林科学家组成的认知社区加强了林业支持联盟的话语。促使比亚沃维耶地区继续进行森林管理的林农提出的一些论点也表明，路径依赖的存在，加上联盟之间的巨大分歧，人们对解决冲突持乐观态度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号