• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Forest and Society >A reflection of Social Forestry in 2019: Towards inclusive and collaborative government approaches
【24h】

A reflection of Social Forestry in 2019: Towards inclusive and collaborative government approaches

机译：2019年社会林业的反思：迈向包容和合作的政府方针

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In this policy forum, we seek to engage in a discussion related to the acceleration of social forestry approaches, foremost led by the Ministry of Environment and Forestry (MOEF), and supported by civil society actors. This article thus points to three key areas of reflection being raised among forums at different governing scales at the end of 2018. The first is a reflection of the national level issues discussed in a forum convened by MOEF in partnership with the media organization Tempo Magazine. The second is part of a reflection on a forum conducted by the Lampung province, which was convened by a coalition of NGOs. Finally, the third forum for reflection involved a public consultation about a study on the impacts of social forestry in South Sulawesi. These three forums highlighted that there is a sharp increase in formal social forestry designations by bureaucratically requiring regions to submit proposals, which are then followed up by verification of sites. This has resulted in a large increase in the number of social forestry permits and has also had the consequence of opening up bureaucratic access (in this case by MOEF) to civil society organizations in more inclusive and collaborative ways. However, on the other hand, we also found that amidst these discussions, there was also a strong element of recentralization emerging in the forestry sector related to permits, in which decision-making powers were being redirected to the central government. Another finding that emerged involves the weakening of capacity among communities themselves to benefit from social forestry designations. Therefore, although there are indications of positive engagement by government towards the principles of collaboration, concerns also emerge about the ways community engagement is unfolding. Overall, this highlights important considerations for improving social forestry policy and implementation for the future.
机译：在这个政策论坛中，我们寻求参与有关加速社会林业方法的讨论，其中最重要的是由环境和林业部（MOEF）领导，并得到民间社会参与者的支持。因此，本文指出了在2018年底不同管理规模的论坛之间提出的三个主要反思领域。第一个是在MOEF与媒体组织Tempo Magazine合作举办的论坛中讨论的国家层面问题的反思。第二部分是对楠榜省举办的一个论坛的反思的一部分，该论坛是由非政府组织联盟召集的。最后，第三次反思论坛涉及对南苏拉威西省社会林业的影响进行研究的公众咨询。这三个论坛着重指出，通过官僚要求各地区提交提案，正式的社会林业名称有了急剧增加，然后对地点进行核实。这导致社会林业许可证的数量大大增加，并且还带来了以更具包容性和协作性的方式向民间社会组织开放官僚主义的机会（在这种情况下是由MOEF）。但是，另一方面，我们还发现，在这些讨论中，林业领域也出现了与许可相关的重新集中化的强大因素，决策权被重新分配给中央政府。出现的另一个发现涉及社区自身从社会林业名称中受益的能力减弱。因此，尽管有迹象表明政府积极参与协作原则，但人们也开始关注社区参与的发展方式。总体而言，这突出了在改进社会林业政策和未来实施方面的重要考虑因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号