首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Public Health >Methods for Streamlining Intervention Fidelity Checklists: An Example from the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program
【24h】

Methods for Streamlining Intervention Fidelity Checklists: An Example from the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program

机译:简化干预保真度清单的方法:来自慢性病自我管理计划的示例

获取原文
           

摘要

Maintaining intervention fidelity should be part of any programmatic quality assurance (QA) plan and is often a licensure requirement. However, fidelity checklists designed by original program developers are often lengthy, which makes compliance difficult once programs become widely disseminated in the field. As a case example, we used Stanford’s original Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP) fidelity checklist of 157 items to demonstrate heuristic procedures for generating shorter fidelity checklists. Using an expert consensus approach, we sought feedback from active master trainers registered with the Stanford University Patient Education Research Center about which items were most essential to, and also feasible for, assessing fidelity. We conducted three sequential surveys and one expert group-teleconference call. Three versions of the fidelity checklist were created using different statistical and methodological criteria. In a final group-teleconference call with seven national experts, there was unanimous agreement that all three final versions (e.g., a 34-item version, a 20-item version, and a 12-item version) should be made available because the purpose and resources for administering a checklist might vary from one setting to another. This study highlights the methodology used to generate shorter versions of a fidelity checklist, which has potential to inform future QA efforts for this and other evidence-based programs (EBP) for older adults delivered in community settings. With CDSMP and other EBP, it is important to differentiate between program fidelity as mandated by program developers for licensure, and intervention fidelity tools for providing an “at-a-glance” snapshot of the level of compliance to selected program indicators.
机译:保持干预的逼真度应该是任何程序质量保证(QA)计划的一部分,并且通常是许可要求。但是,由原始程序开发人员设计的保真度检查表通常很长,一旦程序在该领域得到广泛传播,就很难遵守法规。作为示例,我们使用了斯坦福大学原始的慢性病自我管理计划(CDSMP)保真度清单,该清单包含157个项目,以演示启发式程序来生成较短的保真度清单。我们使用专家共识方法,从斯坦福大学患者教育研究中心注册的活跃的高级培训师那里征求反馈,以了解哪些项目对于评估逼真度最重要,也是可行的。我们进行了3次连续调查和1次专家小组电话会议。使用不同的统计和方法标准创建了三个版本的保真度检查表。在与七位国家专家进行的小组电话会议的最后电话会议中,一致同意应提供所有三个最终版本(例如34个项目,20个项目和12个项目),因为管理清单的资源可能因一项设置而异。这项研究着重介绍了用于生成保真度检查表的较短版本的方法,该方法有可能为将来在社区环境中为老年人提供的针对此和其他循证计划(EBP)的质量检查工作提供信息。使用CDSMP和其他EBP,区分程序开发人员授权的程序保真度和干预保真度工具以提供对选定程序指标的遵从性水平的“概览”快照非常重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号