首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Public Health >Selection and Interpretation of Scientific Evidence in Preparation for Policy Decisions: A Case Study Regarding Introduction of Rotavirus Vaccine Into National Immunization Programs in Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Denmark
【24h】

Selection and Interpretation of Scientific Evidence in Preparation for Policy Decisions: A Case Study Regarding Introduction of Rotavirus Vaccine Into National Immunization Programs in Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Denmark

机译:在政策决策准备中的科学证据的选择和解释:在瑞典,挪威,芬兰和丹麦将轮状病毒疫苗引入国家免疫计划的案例研究

获取原文
           

摘要

The World Health Organization recommends inclusion of rotavirus vaccines in national immunization programs (NIPs) worldwide. Nordic countries are usually considered comparable in terms of demographics and health-care services and have comparable rotavirus disease burden. Nevertheless, the countries have reached different decisions regarding rotavirus vaccine: Norway and Finland have already introduced rotavirus vaccines into their NIPs and Sweden is currently changing its recommendation and vaccines will now be introduced on a national scale while Denmark has decided against it. This study focuses on the selection and interpretation of medical and epidemiological evidence used during the decision-making processes in Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Denmark. The so-called “severity criteria” is identified as one of the main reasons for the different policy decisions reached across the Nordic countries.
机译:世界卫生组织建议将轮状病毒疫苗纳入世界范围内的国家免疫计划(NIP)。北欧国家通常被认为在人口统计学和医疗保健服务方面具有可比性,并且轮状病毒疾病负担可比。尽管如此,这些国家对轮状病毒疫苗已经做出了不同的决定:挪威和芬兰已经将轮状病毒疫苗引入其国家实施计划中,瑞典目前正在改变其建议,现在将在全国范围内引入疫苗,而丹麦则对此表示反对。这项研究的重点是在瑞典,挪威,芬兰和丹麦的决策过程中使用的医学和流行病学证据的选择和解释。所谓的“严重性标准”被确定为北欧国家做出不同政策决定的主要原因之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号