• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Public Health >Control of Cattle Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases by Acaricide in Southern Province of Zambia: A Retrospective Evaluation of Animal Health Measures According to Current One Health Concepts
【24h】

Control of Cattle Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases by Acaricide in Southern Province of Zambia: A Retrospective Evaluation of Animal Health Measures According to Current One Health Concepts

机译：赞比亚南部省通过杀螨剂控制牛Ti病和壁虱病：根据当前一项健康概念对动物卫生措施的回顾性评估

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

One health thinking for health interventions is increasingly being used to capture previously unseen stakeholders and impacts across people, animals, and the environment. The Network for One Health Evaluation (NEOH) proposes a systems-based framework to quantitatively assess integration and highlight the added value (theory of change) that this approach will bring to a project. This case study will retrospectively evaluate the pioneering use of a One Health (OH) approach during an international collaboration (satellite project to tackle production losses due to tick-borne disease in cattle in Southern Zambia in late 1980s). The objective of the evaluation is twofold: retrospective evaluation the OH-ness of the satellite project and identification of costs and benefits. Data for evaluation was recovered from publications, project documents, and witness interviews. A mixed qualitative and quantitative evaluation was undertaken. In this case study, a transdisciplinary approach allowed for the identification of a serious public health risk arising from the unexpected reuse of chemical containers by the local public against advice. Should this pioneering project not have been completed then it is assumed this behavior could have had a large impact on public wellbeing and ultimately reduced regional productivity and compromised welfare. From the economic evaluation, the costs of implementing this OH approach, helping to avoid harm, were small in comparison to overall project costs. The overall OH Index was 0.34. The satellite project demonstrated good OH operations by managing to incorporate the input across multiple dimensions but was slightly weaker on OH infrastructures (OH Ratio = 1.20). These quantitative results can be used in the initial validation and benchmarking of this novel framework. Limitations of the evaluation were mainly a lack of data due to the length of time since project completion and a lack of formal monitoring of program impact. In future health strategy development and execution, routine monitoring and evaluation from an OH perspective (by utilizing the framework proposed by NEOH), could prove valuable or used as a tool for retrospective evaluation of existing policies.
机译：人们越来越多地将一种针对健康干预措施的健康思想用于捕捉以前看不见的利益相关者以及对人类，动物和环境的影响。一个人健康评估网络（NEOH）提出了一个基于系统的框架，以定量评估整合并突出该方法将带给项目的附加值（变革理论）。该案例研究将回顾性评估一项国际合作（一项旨在解决由于赞比亚南部1980年代末牛的tick传播疾病引起的生产损失的卫星项目）的“一生”（OH）方法的开拓性应用。评估的目的有两个：回顾性评估卫星项目的OH-ness和确定成本和收益。从出版物，项目文件和证人访谈中回收了评估数据。进行了混合的定性和定量评估。在本案例研究中，跨学科方法允许识别由当地公众根据建议意外使用化学容器而引起的严重公共健康风险。如果这项开创性的项目还没有完成，那么可以认为这种行为可能对公众福祉产生重大影响，并最终降低区域生产力和损害福利。从经济评估来看，与总体项目成本相比，实施这种OH方法有助于避免伤害的成本很小。总体OH指数为0.34。该卫星项目通过设法在多个维度上合并输入来展示良好的OH运作，但在OH基础设施上的表现稍弱（OH比率== 1.20）。这些定量结果可用于此新颖框架的初步验证和基准测试。评估的局限性主要是由于自项目完成以来的时间长度以及缺乏对计划影响的正式监测所致的数据不足。在未来的健康策略制定和执行中，从OH的角度（通过利用NEOH提出的框架）进行例行监测和评估可能被证明是有价值的，或者可以用作对现有政策进行回顾性评估的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号