首页> 外文期刊>Malaysian Journal of Computer Science >Determining Evaluation Criteria And Sub-Criteria For E-Learning Software
【24h】

Determining Evaluation Criteria And Sub-Criteria For E-Learning Software

机译:确定电子学习软件的评估标准和子标准

获取原文
           

摘要

Today demands for e-learning have led to the emergence of numerous and diverse e-Learning software (e-LS) products in the market. With such a myriad of choices, selecting an e-LS can be difficult. In any software evaluation process, evaluation criteria are important for correct selection to be made. However, in the case of e-LS selection, information about its evaluation criteria is lacking. Hence, a Delphi study was conducted to identify the evaluation criteria for e-LS. This paper presents the study and its results. Eleven criteria and sixty six 66 sub-criteria were identified from the literature. A questionnaire comprising the criteria as items was distributed to 31 experts in the first round. 16 sub-criteria were added by the experts. After two Delphi rounds, three criteria were considered as being extremely important and eight criteria as important. One sub-criteria was rejected as it did not achieve the majority of expert consensus. In total, 11 criteria and 81 sub-criteria were obtained from this study. The results of this study indicate that these criteria and sub-criteria are important in the evaluation of e-LS.
机译:如今,对电子学习的需求导致市场上出现了众多多样的电子学习软件(e-LS)产品。有了如此众多的选择,选择e-LS可能会很困难。在任何软件评估过程中,评估标准对于正确选择都很重要。但是,在选择e-LS的情况下,缺少有关其评估标准的信息。因此,进行了一项Delphi研究,以确定e-LS的评估标准。本文介绍了这项研究及其结果。从文献中确定了11条标准和66条66条子标准。在第一轮中,向31位专家分发了包含作为项目标准的问卷。专家们增加了16个子标准。经过两次德尔菲回合后,三个标准被认为是极其重要的,而八个标准被认为是重要的。一项次级标准被拒绝,因为它没有达到大多数专家的共识。这项研究总共获得11条标准和81条子标准。这项研究的结果表明,这些标准和子标准对e-LS的评估很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号