首页> 外文期刊>Materials >A Discussion on the Interpretation of the Darcy Equation in Case of Open-Cell Metal Foam Based on Numerical Simulations
【24h】

A Discussion on the Interpretation of the Darcy Equation in Case of Open-Cell Metal Foam Based on Numerical Simulations

机译:基于数值模拟的开孔金属泡沫达西方程解释的讨论

获取原文
           

摘要

It is long known that for high-velocity fluid flow in porous media, the relation between the pressure drop and the superficial velocity is not linear. Indeed, the classical Darcy law for shear stress dominated flow needs to be extended with a quadratic term, resulting in the empirical Darcy–Forchheimer model. Another approach is to simulate the foam numerically through the volume averaging technique. This leads to a natural separation of the total drag force into the contribution of the shear forces and the contribution of the pressure forces. Both representations of the total drag lead to the same result. The physical correspondence between both approaches is investigated in this work. The contribution of the viscous and pressure forces on the total drag is investigated using direct numerical simulations. Special attention is paid to the dependency on the velocity of these forces. The separation of the drag into its constituent terms on experimental grounds and for the volume average approach is unified. It is shown that the common approach to identify the linear term with the viscous forces and the quadratic term with the pressure forces is not correct.
机译:众所周知,对于多孔介质中的高速流体流动,压降与表观速度之间的关系不是线性的。实际上,需要用二次项来扩展关于剪切应力为主流的经典达西定律,从而得出经验性的达西-福希海默模型。另一种方法是通过体积平均技术对泡沫进行数值模拟。这导致总阻力自然地分离为剪切力的贡献和压力力的贡献。总阻力的两种表示方式导致相同的结果。在这项工作中研究了两种方法之间的物理对应关系。使用直接数值模拟研究了粘性和压力对总阻力的贡献。要特别注意这些力的速度依赖性。在实验基础上和对于体积平均方法,将阻力分为其组成项是统一的。结果表明,用粘性力来识别线性项和用压力来识别二次项的通用方法是不正确的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号