...
【24h】

Invited Commentary

机译:邀请评论

获取原文
           

摘要

In their report entitled “Poor outcomes resulting from ventricular assist devices implanted in hospitals without dedicated ventricular assist device programs” (1), Dr Anyanwu and colleagues describe their experiences with 12 patients who had received ventricular assist device placement for cardiogenic shock from facilities that do not have long-term implantable device programs. They identified technical issues that contrib- uted to their poor outcomes. Their subsequent conclu- sions were that these patients should alternatively be placed on inotropes and an intra-aortic balloon pump and transferred to centers that ar more focused on mechanical support for therapy. I disagree with this approach.
机译:在其题为“由于没有专门的心室辅助设备计划而在医院中植入心室辅助设备而导致的预后不良”(1)的报告中,Anyanwu博士及其同事描述了他们对12例因心源性休克而接受了心室休克的患者的经验没有长期的植入式设备程序。他们确定了导致不良结果的技术问题。他们随后的结论是,这些患者应替代地置于正性肌力药和主动脉内球囊泵上,然后转移到更侧重于机械支持治疗的中心。我不同意这种方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号