• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Medical Education Online >Personal profile of medical students selected through a knowledge-based exam only: are we missing suitable students?
【24h】

Personal profile of medical students selected through a knowledge-based exam only: are we missing suitable students?

机译：仅通过基于知识的考试选择的医学生的个人资料：我们是否缺少合适的学生？

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

IntroductionA consistent body of literature highlights the importance of a broader approach to select medical school candidates both assessing cognitive capacity and individual characteristics. However, selection in a great number of medical schools worldwide is still based on knowledge exams, a procedure that might neglect students with needed personal characteristics for future medical practice. We investigated whether the personal profile of students selected through a knowledge-based exam differed from those not selected.MethodsStudents applying for medical school (N =311) completed questionnaires assessing motivations for becoming a doctor, learning approaches, personality traits, empathy, and coping styles. Selection was based on the results of MCQ tests. Principal component analysis was used to draw a profile of the students. Differences between selected and non-selected students were examined by Multivariate ANOVAs, and their impact on selection by logistic regression analysis.ResultsStudents demonstrating a profile of diligence with higher conscientiousness, deep learning approach, and task-focused coping were more frequently selected (p =0.01). Other personal characteristics such as motivation, sociability, and empathy did not significantly differ, comparing selected and non-selected students.ConclusionSelection through a knowledge-based exam privileged diligent students. It did neither advantage nor preclude candidates with a more humane profile.
机译：简介一致的文献资料突显了采用更广泛的方法来选择评估认知能力和个人特征的医学院校候选人的重要性。但是，全世界许多医学院校的选拔仍然是基于知识考试，该程序可能会忽略具有个人特征的学生以进行未来的医学实践。我们调查了通过基于知识的考试选出的学生的个人资料与未选出的学生的个人资料是否有差异。方法申请医学院的学生（ N = 311）完成了调查问卷，评估了成为医生的动机，学习方法，人格特质，同理心以及应对方式。选择基于MCQ测试的结果。主成分分析用于绘制学生的资料。通过多元方差分析（ANOVA）检查选择和未选择学生之间的差异，并通过logistic回归分析检查其对选择的影响。 > p = 0.01）。与选择的学生和未选择的学生相比，其他个人特征（例如动机，社交能力和同情心）没有显着差异。结论通过基于知识的考试，勤奋的学生获得了选择。它既没有优势，也没有排除具有更人道色彩的候选人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号