• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Medical Education Online >What does the multiple mini interview have to offer over the panel interview?
【24h】

What does the multiple mini interview have to offer over the panel interview?

机译：小组迷你访谈需要提供什么？

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

IntroductionThis paper compares the panel interview (PI) performance with the multiple mini interview (MMI) performance and indication of behavioural concerns of a sample of medical school applicants. The acceptability of the MMI was also assessed.Materials and methodsAll applicants shortlisted for a PI were invited to an MMI. Applicants attended a 30-min PI with two faculty interviewers followed by an MMI consisting of ten 8-min stations. Applicants were assessed on their performance at each MMI station by one faculty. The interviewer also indicated if they perceived the applicant to be a concern. Finally, applicants completed an acceptability questionnaire.ResultsFrom the analysis of 133 (75.1%) completed MMI scoresheets, the MMI scores correlated statistically significantly with the PI scores (r =0.438, p =0.001). Both were not statistically associated with sex, age, race, or pre-university academic ability to any significance. Applicants assessed as a concern at two or more stations performed statistically significantly less well at the MMI when compared with those who were assessed as a concern at one station or none at all. However, there was no association with PI performance. Acceptability scores were generally high, and comparison of mean scores for each of the acceptability questionnaire items did not show statistically significant differences between sex and race categories.ConclusionsAlthough PI and MMI performances are correlated, the MMI may have the added advantage of more objectively generating multiple impressions of the applicant's interpersonal skill, thoughtfulness, and general demeanour. Results of the present study indicated that the MMI is acceptable in a multicultural context.
机译：简介本文将小组面试（PI）的表现与多次迷你面试（MMI）的表现进行了比较，并比较了医学院校申请人样本的行为关注点。还评估了MMI的可接受性。材料和方法所有入围PI的申请人均被邀请参加MMI。申请人参加了30分钟的PI，由两名教职面试官陪同，随后参加了由10个8分钟的工作站组成的MMI。由一名教员评估每个MMI工作站的申请人表现。面试官还指出他们是否认为申请人是一个问题。最后，申请人完成了可接受性问卷调查。结果通过对133张（75.1％）完整的MMI评分表进行分析，MMI评分与PI评分在统计学上显着相关（ 0.438， p = 0.001）。两者在统计学上均与性别，年龄，种族或大学预科学习能力无关。与在一个站点被评估为关注点或根本没有评估为关注点的申请人相比，在两个或更多站点被评估为关注点的申请人在MMI上的表现显着降低。但是，与PI性能无关。可接受性分数通常很高，并且每个可接受性问卷调查项目的平均分数比较在性别和种族类别之间没有统计学上的显着差异。对申请人的人际交往能力，体贴和一般举止的印象。本研究结果表明，在多种文化背景下，MMI是可以接受的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号