...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Medical Ethics Journal >Interventions to improve research human subjects’ understanding for informed consent in quantitative studies: review of articles
【24h】

Interventions to improve research human subjects’ understanding for informed consent in quantitative studies: review of articles

机译：干预措施以提高研究对象对定量研究知情同意的理解：文章复习

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Introduction: Informed consent and participation of human subjects in clinical studies, even when there is no adverse effects, is important, so, it leads to constructive relationship between the physician and the client. Potentially, this improves the safety of the study and favorable outcomes, and minimizes side effects and feeling of coercion and discomfort in participants. The aim of this research was to identify the effective interventions to improve research participants’ understanding of informed consent trough search in databases from 2003 to 2013. Methods: Clinical, longitudinal trials and trials by control group with at least one control group reviewed and compared. Results: From total of 15 studies that has inclusion criteria, we utilized multimedia interventions in 5 studies, enhanced consent forms in 4 studies and educational interventions, debates and corrective feedback in 6 studies. From these studies 4, 2 and 5 studies reported significant improvement in participants’ understanding, respectively. Conclusion: So, the process of informed consent based on ethical principle of respect for Autonomy is valuable, when the researcher conducts human subjects to free and informed choice, compassionately. For this reason, education and face-to-face counseling, regarding more time and interaction, and use of multimedia methods especially in patients with lower capacity is recommended.
机译：简介：即使在没有不良影响的情况下，受试者的知情同意和参与也很重要，因此，这将导致医师与服务对象之间的建设性关系。潜在地，这可以提高研究的安全性和良好的结果，并最大程度地降低参与者的副作用以及强迫和不适感。这项研究的目的是确定有效的干预措施，以提高研究参与者从2003年至2013年在数据库中进行的知情同意书搜索的理解。方法：临床，纵向试验和对照组进行的试验，并至少与一个对照组进行比较。结果：在总共15项纳入标准的研究中，我们在5项研究中使用了多媒体干预，在4项研究中使用了增强同意书形式，在6项研究中采用了教育干预，辩论和纠正反馈。在这些研究中，有4、2和5个研究分别报告了参与者的理解有了显着改善。结论：因此，当研究人员富有同情心地对人类受试者进行自由和知情选择时，基于尊重自主权的道德原则的知情同意的过程是有价值的。因此，建议进行有关更多时间和互动的教育和面对面咨询，尤其是在能力较低的患者中，应使用多媒体方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号