Plagiarism: Who is responsible author or the journal editors?

I Banerjee; B Roy; B Sathian; A Saha

首页> 外文期刊>Nepal Journal of Epidemiology >Plagiarism: Who is responsible author or the journal editors?

【24h】

Plagiarism: Who is responsible author or the journal editors?

机译：gi窃：谁是负责任的作者或期刊编辑？

获取原文

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

I am writing in context to an article recently been published in the Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, Volume 3, Issue 4, July-August 2013 entitled ‘’Medications For Anxiety: A Drug Utilization Study In Psychiatry Outpatients From A Tertiary Care Centre Of Eastern India’4. http://jddtonline.info/index.php/jddt/article/view/574 I was very shocked to see that the above article is plagiarized from one of my paper which is the most popular article 53475 views till 21st July 2013 in NJE, ‘’Medications for Anxiety: A Drug Utilization Study In Psychiatry Inpatients From A Tertiary Care Centre of Western Nepal’’5 published in Nepal Journal of Epidemiology on September 2011. http:/epjol.info/index.php/NJE/article/view/5753DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126je.v3i3.9190 Nepal Journal of Epidemiology 2013;3(3): 277-278

机译：我是根据最近发表在《药物输送与治疗学杂志》第3卷第4期，2013年7月至8月的一篇文章撰写的，标题为``焦虑症的药物：来自美国三级医疗中心的精神科门诊患者的药物利用研究''印度东部'4。 http://jddtonline.info/index.php/jddt/article/view/574我很震惊地看到以上文章被我的其中一篇文章窃，这是截至2013年7月21日在NJE上最受欢迎的文章53475次，“焦虑药物：来自尼泊尔西部三级护理中心的精神病住院患者的药物利用研究” 5，于2011年9月发表在《尼泊尔流行病学杂志》上。http:/epjol.info/index.php/NJE/article / view / 5753DOI：http://dx.doi.org/10.3126je.v3i3.9190尼泊尔流行病学杂志2013; 3（3）：277-278

著录项

来源
《Nepal Journal of Epidemiology》 |2013年第3期|共2页
作者
I Banerjee; B Roy; B Sathian; A Saha;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类流行病学与防疫;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Similarity and Plagiarism in Scholarly Journal Submissions: Bringing Clarity to the Concept for Authors, Reviewers and Editors [J] . Aamir Raoof Memon Journal of Korean medical science. . 2020,第27期

机译：学术期刊提交中的相似性和抄袭：为作者，审稿人和编辑的概念带来清晰度
2. Do Journals' Author Guidelines Tell Us What We Need to Know about Plagiarism? [J] . YU-CHIH SUN Journal of scholarly publishing . 2021,第3期

机译：To Journals'作者指南告诉我们我们需要了解抄袭的内容吗？
3. Authorship problems in scholarly journals: Considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors [J] . GasparyanA.Y., AyvazyanL., KitasG.D. Rheumatology international. . 2013,第2期

机译：学术期刊中的作者资格问题：作者，同行审稿人和编辑的注意事项
4. (664) HOW TO USE RESPONSIBLE FEEDBACK AND PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT JOURNALS TO ABATE PLAGIARISM IN ONLINE EDUCATION [C] . Lucia Morales, Nataliia Stukalo International Technology, Education and Development Conference . 2015

机译：（664）如何使用负责任的反馈和个人发展期刊在线教育中的抄袭
5. Electronic journals as innovations: A study of author and editor early adopters. [D] . Hahn, Karla Lynn. 1999

机译：电子期刊作为创新：作者和编辑的早期采用者研究。
6. Similarity and Plagiarism in Scholarly Journal Submissions: Bringing Clarity to the Concept for Authors Reviewers and Editors [O] . Aamir Raoof Memon 2020

机译：学术期刊论文的相似性和Pla窃性：为作者评论者和编辑者提供清晰的概念
7. The Framingham Offspring Study: a commentary1150th AnniversaryHistorical ArticleINTRODUCTIONIn this edition of the Journal, we release the fifth in a series of reviews of influential articles that have been previously published in ACC journals, including the American Journal of Cardiology(from 1958 to 1982) and JACC(from 1983 to the present). The publication of these articles is only one aspect of the ACC’s 50th anniversary commemoration, which highlights 50 years of leadership in cardiovascular care and education. The articles are intended to encourage reflection on the remarkable progress made in cardiovascular medicine over time, as well as to acknowledge the amazing prescience of some early investigators in anticipating and, in many cases, later guiding developments in their field.The working group responsible for selecting these articles and asking reviewers to write editorials solicited suggestions from the ACC’s clinical committees and individual members.The group achieved consensus fairly easily, including whom the group should ask to prepare the accompanying editorials. We initially drew up a list of 14 general areas to cover in this series, but later found that there are several major areas of modern cardiology, prominently molecular cardiology, in which the truly landmark articles have, alas, not yet been published in JACC. Therefore, the working group decided not to categorize by subject, but instead, to concentrate on the most important articles.The working group, a task force of the Subcommittee for the Commemoration of the ACC 50th Anniversary, owes a great deal to Ms. May A. Roustom and the efficient and tireless staff at Heart House for facilitating this project. We also wish to thank all who suggested articles and, most important, the authors who prepared reviews for their willingness to contribute their time and wisdom.Influential Articles in JACC Working GroupSharon A. Hunt, M.D., F.A.C.C.Rick A. Nishimura, M.D., F.A.C.C.H.J.C. Swan, M.D., Ph.D., M.A.C.C.Michael J. Wolk, M.D., F.A.C.C. [O] . Swan H.J.C 1999

机译：弗雷明汉后代研究：1150周年历史文章引言在本期杂志中，我们发布了一系列有影响力的文章的第五篇评论，这些评论先前已在ACC期刊上发表，包括《美国心脏病学杂志》（1958年至1982年）和《美国心脏病学会杂志》（从1983年至今）。这些文章的发表只是ACC成立50周年纪念的一个方面，该纪念日着重介绍了心血管护理和教育领域50年的领导地位。这些文章旨在鼓励人们对心血管医学随着时间的推移所取得的显着进展进行反思，并承认一些早期研究人员在预见并在许多情况下为他们领域的发展提供指导的惊人先见之明。选择这些文章并要求审稿人撰写社论，征求ACC临床委员会和个人成员的建议。该小组相当容易达成共识，包括该小组应要求谁准备随附的社论。我们最初拟出了本系列文章涵盖的14个常规领域的清单，但后来发现现代心脏病学有几个主要领域，主要是分子心脏病学，可惜的是，真正的具有里程碑意义的文章尚未在JACC上发表。因此，工作组决定不按主题进行分类，而是专注于最重要的文章。工作组是ACC成立50周年纪念小组委员会的一个工作组，在很大程度上要归功于梅女士。 A. Roustom和Heart House高效而孜孜不倦的员工为该项目提供了便利。我们还要感谢所有提出建议的文章，最重要的是感谢准备撰写评论以贡献自己的时间和智慧的作者.JACC工作组的有影响力的文章Sharon A. Swan，M.D.，Ph.D.，M.A.C.C. Michael J.Wolk，M.D.，F.A.C.C.

Plagiarism: Who is responsible author or the journal editors?

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅