首页> 外文期刊>Nepal Journal of Epidemiology >Accessing research literature: A mixed-method study of academics in Higher Education Institutions in Nepal
【24h】

Accessing research literature: A mixed-method study of academics in Higher Education Institutions in Nepal

机译:访问研究文献:尼泊尔高等院校学者的混合研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Research in Higher Education (HE), particularly in health and medical sciences plays a crucial role, not only in enhancing knowledge and skills of students and academics, but also in helping to develop managers and policy makers who rely on evidence-based planning and programming. This paper reports university teacher’s knowledge and practices in accessing to electronic research-based evidences in health and medical sciences in Nepal. Material and Methods: This was mixed-methods study comprising a self-administered questionnaire completed by HE teachers and informant key interviews with authorities of HE institutions. A total of 15 out of the total 40 institutions offering HE above Bachelors level on health-related subjects were included for the study. Results: The response rate was 68%; 244 out of 360 HE teachers completed self-administered questionnaire. The respondents comprised nurses (36%), followed by doctors (23%), public health practitioners (18%), dentists (17%) and pharmacists (12%). Most of the HE teachers reported that they have computer skills and possess their own computer. Two-thirds (66%) of the HE teachers had work email and almost all (93%) have a personal email ID. All institutions had a computer lab and/or library. Almost all teachers had internet access at work but the internet was reportedly slow. Each institution had a librarian to support to the students and staff but only a third of teachers sought their help. Many do not know what kind of support librarians can provide. Less than half of the staff had accessed electronic research materials. This proportion varied between HE institutions ranging from 13 to 83%. HINARI and PubMed were the mostly used research databases. Less than half of respondents (48%) had published research papers in peer-reviewed journals, and only 19% published a paper based on a systematic review. Female HE teachers were less likely to publish (32%) than males (68%). More readers and professors had published (75%) than instructors/assistant lecturers (30%) and lecturers (45%). Conclusions: Accessing electronic research literature provides an opportunity to gathering up-to-date research-based information that should be core to all health curricula. We call upon curriculum developers and university authorities in Nepal to revise health curricula and help build electronic searching skills among staff and students. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126je.v4i4.11375 Nepal Journal of Epidemiology 2014; 4(4):405-14
机译:背景:高等教育(HE),特别是健康和医学领域的研究起着至关重要的作用,不仅在增强学生和学者的知识和技能方面,而且在帮助发展依赖循证计划的管理人员和政策制定者方面和编程。本文报道了尼泊尔教师在获取以电子研究为基础的健康和医学方面的证据方面的知识和实践。资料和方法:这是一项混合方法研究,包括由高校教师完成的自我管理调查表以及对高校机构主管部门进行的知情人士关键访谈。在总共40所提供健康相关科目的本科以上学历的机构中,总共有15家被纳入研究。结果:有效率68%。在360名高中教师中,有244人完成了自行填写的问卷。受访者包括护士(36%),其次是医生(23%),公共卫生从业人员(18%),牙医(17%)和药剂师(12%)。大多数高校教师报告说,他们具有计算机技能,并且拥有自己的计算机。三分之二(66%)的高中教师有工作电子邮件,几乎所有(93%)都有个人电子邮件ID。所有机构都有计算机实验室和/或图书馆。几乎所有的老师都可以在工作中使用互联网,但据报道互联网速度很慢。每个机构都有一个图书馆员来支持学生和教职员工,但是只有三分之一的老师寻求他们的帮助。许多人不知道图书馆员可以提供什么样的支持。不到一半的员工使用了电子研究材料。高等教育机构的这一比例从13%到83%不等。 HINARI和PubMed是最常用的研究数据库。不到一半的受访者(48%)在同行评审期刊上发表过研究论文,只有19%的受访者根据系统评价发表过论文。女HE老师的发表可能性(32%)比男(68%)小。出版的读者和教授多于(75%),而不是讲师/助理讲师(30%)和讲师(45%)。结论:访问电子研究文献为收集应作为所有健康课程核心的基于研究的最新信息提供了机会。我们呼吁尼泊尔的课程开发人员和大学当局修改健康课程,并帮助在教职员工和学生中建立电子搜索技能。 DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.3126je.v4i4.11375尼泊尔流行病学杂志2014; 4(4):405-14

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号