...
【24h】

指法无保护会阴接生法的临床效果观察与护理

机译:指法无保护会阴接生法的临床效果观察与护理

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract:ABSTRACT: Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of unprotected perineum midwives in puerperas with vaginal delivery. Methods A total of 80 primiparas with normal delivery were selected and randomly divided into two groups, 40 cases in each group. Observation group was conducted with unprotected perineum midwives, while control group was conducted with the conventional protective perineum midwives. Rate of lateral episiotomy, rate of vaginal laceration of perineum and condition of perineal pain were compared between two groups. Results In the observation group, the rate of lateral episiotomy was 30%, and the moderate pain rate of perineum was 7.5%. In the control group, the rate of lateral episiotomy was 80%, and the moderate pain rate of perineum was 32.5%. The rate of lateral episiotomy and condition of perineal pain in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group (P0.05). Conclusion Compared with the conventional protective perineum midwives, unprotected perineum midwives can reduce the rate of lateral episiotomy in primiparas, alleviate the perineal pain and improve comfortable degree, so it is worthy of clinical popularization and application.
机译:摘要:摘要:目的探讨无保护的会阴助产士在产后阴道分娩中的临床疗效。方法选取80例正常分娩的初产妇,随机分为两组,每组40例。观察组采用未保护的会阴助产士,而对照组采用常规的保护性会阴助产士。比较两组的外​​侧会阴切开率,会阴部阴道裂伤率和会阴部疼痛情况。结果观察组外侧会阴切开率为30%,会阴中度疼痛率为7.5%。对照组外侧会阴切开率为80%,会阴部中度疼痛率为32.5%。观察组外侧会阴切开率和会阴部疼痛情况明显优于对照组(P <0.05)。结论与常规保护性会阴助产士相比,未保护性会阴助产士可以降低初产妇的侧面会阴切开率,减轻会阴部疼痛,改善舒适度,值得临床推广应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号