• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Landscape Online >Private Gardens as Urban Greenspaces: Can They Compensate for Poor Greenspace Access in Lower Socioeconomic Neighbourhoods?
【24h】

Private Gardens as Urban Greenspaces: Can They Compensate for Poor Greenspace Access in Lower Socioeconomic Neighbourhoods?

机译：作为城市绿地的私家花园：它们可以补偿社会经济较低地区的贫困绿地通道吗？

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The increasing process of urbanisation has major implications for the environment, biodiversity, and health and well-being of urban residents. Empirical evidence for urban greening benefits suggests that it is an appropriate planning and policy approach for tackling some of the problems associated with urbanisation, including biodiversity loss and heat island effects. Gardens on private residential lots represent a substantial proportion of greenspaces in low density cities with extensive suburban areas. Drawing on a qualitative study of residents in Sunshine North, Melbourne, Australia, this paper discusses three questions about the relationship of private gardens to public greenspaces: 1) how does residents’ use of private gardens impact their use of other neighbourhood greenspaces; 2) can private gardens address inequality of access to greenspaces in lower income neighbourhoods; and, 3) what does this imply for planning and neighbourhood design? Contrary to previous research, the findings did not show a meaningful relationship between residents’ use of their gardens and local greenspaces, and further, that large yards and gardens do not substitute for poor access to local greenspaces. The paper concludes that policy makers and planners cannot assume private gardens and public greenspaces are interchangeable. While private gardens and local greenspaces can both provide positive benefits to residents, private gardens do not act as a substitute for local greenspaces in neighbourhoods of varying socio-economic status.
机译：不断增长的城市化进程对环境，生物多样性以及城市居民的健康和福祉具有重大影响。关于城市绿化效益的经验证据表明，这是解决与城市化相关的一些问题（包括生物多样性丧失和热岛效应）的适当规划和政策方法。私人住宅区的花园在郊区人口众多的低密度城市中占很大比例的绿地。基于对澳大利亚墨尔本北部阳光北岸居民的定性研究，本文讨论了有关私家花园与公共绿地之间关系的三个问题：1）居民对私家花园的使用如何影响他们对其他邻里绿地的使用; 2）私家花园能否解决低收入社区进入绿色空间的不平等现象; 3）这对规划和邻里设计意味着什么？与以前的研究相反，研究结果并未显示居民使用花园和当地绿地之间的有意义的关系，而且，大院子和花园不能代替人们进入当地绿地的不良通道。本文的结论是，政策制定者和规划者不能假定私人花园和公共绿地是可互换的。虽然私人花园和当地绿地都可以为居民带来积极的好处，但是私人花园并不能替代社会经济地位各异的社区中的当地绿地。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号