首页> 外文期刊>Low Carbon Economy >Analysis of Life-Cycle Energy Use and GHG Emissions of the Biomass-to-Ethanol Pathway of the Coskata Process under Chinese Conditions
【24h】

Analysis of Life-Cycle Energy Use and GHG Emissions of the Biomass-to-Ethanol Pathway of the Coskata Process under Chinese Conditions

机译:中国条件下Coskata过程生命周期能量消耗和GHG排放量的生物质转化为乙醇的路径分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Life-cycle analyses of energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were carried out for three scenarios of the Coskata biomass-to-ethanol (EtOH) process under Chinese conditions using the original Tsinghua China Automotive Energy LCA Model in conjunction with a module developed particularly for the Coskata process. The results show that 1) the Coskata pathway has good performance in terms of life-cycle fossil energy use and GHG emissions; 2) the electricity used in the biomass-to-EtOH process has the most significant effect on life-cycle fossil-energy use, natural gas as boiler fuel has the second-greatest effect, while fuel used in feedstock transportation has the third; and 3) different energy resources for boilers in the biomass-to-EtOH factory provide different life-cycle results: coal is the least favorable while biomass is the most favorable. We conclude that 1) the Coskata pathway has the dual merits of fossil energy-savings and lower GHG emissions compared with all other bio-EtOH pathways and conventional gasoline in China; and 2) shifting from coal as the fuel for factory boilers to biomass will strengthen the advantages.
机译:使用原始的清华中国汽车能源LCA模型和开发的模块,针对在中国条件下Coskata生物质制乙醇工艺的三种情况进行了能源使用和温室气体(GHG)排放的生命周期分析。特别是对于Coskata工艺。结果表明:1)Coskata途径在生命周期的化石能源使用和温室气体排放方面表现良好; 2)生物质转化为EtOH的过程中使用的电力对生命周期的化石能源使用影响最大,天然气作为锅炉燃料的影响最大,而用于原料运输的燃料的影响最大。 3)生物质制乙醇工厂锅炉的不同能源来源提供不同的生命周期结果:煤是最不利的,而生物质是最有利的。我们得出的结论是:1)与中国所有其他生物乙醇途径和常规汽油相比,科斯塔卡途径具有节约化石能源和降低温室气体排放的双重优势; 2)从煤炭作为工厂锅炉的燃料向生物质的转变将增强其优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号