...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiologia Brasileira >Uso do contraste dinamico e da sequência de difus?o em ressonancia magnética na identifica??o de linfonodos cervicais malignos
【24h】

Uso do contraste dinamico e da sequência de difus?o em ressonancia magnética na identifica??o de linfonodos cervicais malignos

机译:动态对比和扩散序列在磁共振中识别恶性宫颈淋巴结的用途

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: To examine the potential of two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques-dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-for the detection of malignant cervical lymph nodes. Materials and Methods: Using DCE and DWI, we evaluated 33 cervical lymph nodes. For the DCE technique, the maximum relative enhancement, relative enhancement, time to peak enhancement, wash-in rate, wash-out rate, brevity of enhancement, and area under the curve were calculated from a semi-quantitative analysis. For the DWI technique, apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were acquired in the region of interest of each lymph node. Cystic or necrotic parts were excluded. All patients underwent neck dissection or node biopsy. Imaging results were correlated with the histopathological findings. None of the patients underwent neoadjuvant treatment before neck dissection. Results: Relative enhancement, maximum relative enhancement, and the wash-in rate were significantly higher in malignant lymph nodes than in benign lymph nodes ( p 0.009; p 0.05; and p 0.03, respectively). The time to peak enhancement was significantly shorter in the malignant lymph nodes ( p 0.02). In the multivariate analysis, the variables identified as being the most capable of distinguishing between benign and malignant lymph nodes were time to peak enhancement (sensitivity, 73.7%; specificity, 69.2%) and relative enhancement (sensitivity, 89.2%; specificity, 69.2%). Conclusion: Although DCE was able to differentiate between benign and malignant lymph nodes, there is still no consensus regarding the use of a semi-quantitative analysis, which is difficult to apply in a clinical setting. Low ADCs can predict metastatic disease, although inflammatory processes might lead to false-positive results.
机译:目的:探讨动态磁共振增强(DCE)和弥散加权成像(DWI)两种磁共振成像技术检测恶性宫颈淋巴结的潜力。材料和方法:使用DCE和DWI,我们评估了33个宫颈淋巴结。对于DCE技术,通过半定量分析计算了最大相对增强,相对增强,达到峰增强的时间,冲入率,冲出率,增强的简便性和曲线下面积。对于DWI技术,在每个淋巴结的目标区域中获取了视在扩散系数(ADC)。囊性或坏死部分被排除。所有患者均行颈清扫术或淋巴结活检。影像学结果与组织病理学发现相关。颈清扫前没有患者接受新辅助治疗。结果:恶性淋巴结的相对增强,最大相对增强和洗入率显着高于良性淋巴结(分别为p <0.009,p <0.05和p <0.03)。在恶性淋巴结中,达到峰值的时间明显缩短(p <0.02)。在多变量分析中,被识别为最能区分良性和恶性淋巴结的变量是达到峰值增强的时间(敏感性为73.7%;特异性为69.2%)和相对增强的时间(敏感性为89.2%;特异性为69.2%)。 )。结论:尽管DCE能够区分良性和恶性淋巴结,但关于半定量分析的使用仍未达成共识,这在临床环境中很难应用。低ADC值可以预测转移性疾病,尽管炎症过程可能导致假阳性结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号