• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Research Journal of Fisheries and Hydrobiology >The rating and comparison of sport facilities of Azad Universities of Kerman with existent standards
【24h】

The rating and comparison of sport facilities of Azad Universities of Kerman with existent standards

机译：现有标准对克尔曼阿扎德大学体育设施的评分和比较

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The aim of this study was the ratings and comparison of sport facilities of Azaduniversities of Kerman with existent standards. The research method was descriptiveand the method of dada collecting was the field research, in term of aim was the appliedresearch. To collect the data, the check lists were used that made by researcher and todetermine the validity, the check lists gave to 15 of sport teachers in universities andsport commentators and their comments were considered in the check lists. Then, todetermine the objectivity after completing the check lists for 5 indoor and outdoor sportcomplexes by researcher and co-workers, objective coefficient was 0.83. Statisticalsociety was all of the Kerman Azad university (n=14) that statistical sample of theresearch was considered as statistical society. In this study, descriptive statistics wasused to examine the data. The findings showed that in rating of Azad Universities ofKerman province, based on per capita of outdoor sport spaces and comparison with percapita student of outdoor sport spaces in Iran and international standards, Bardsir AzadUniversity was standard only. Based on per capita of indoor sport spaces andcomparison with per capita student in Iran and international standards, Anbar Abad andZarand have per capita student of indoor sport spaces in Iran only. Therefore, accordingto these findings we can conclude that there is a significant difference between percapita indoor sport spaces and score. And according to the rating based on the publicfacilities, the first rank belonged to Kerman and based on all of expert equipments inindoor spaces, the first rank belonged to Kahnooj and in outdoor spaces, the first rankbelonged to Zarand.
机译：这项研究的目的是对克尔曼Azaduniversities体育设施的评级和现有标准进行比较。研究方法是描述性的，数据采集的方法是实地研究，目的是应用研究。为了收集数据，使用研究人员制作的检查表并确定其有效性，将检查表提供给15位大学和体育评论员的体育教师，并在检查表中考虑他们的评论。然后，由研究人员和同事完成5个室内和室外运动综合体的清单后，确定客观性，客观系数为0.83。统计社会是克尔曼·阿扎德大学（n = 14）的全部，研究的统计样本被视为统计社会。在这项研究中，使用描述性统计数据检查数据。调查结果表明，在对德国阿扎德大学的评级中，基于人均户外运动场所的数量，并与伊朗户外运动场所的人均学生数和国际标准进行比较，巴德西尔·阿扎德大学仅是标准。基于室内运动场所的人均数量以及与伊朗人均学生数和国际标准的比较，安巴尔·阿巴德（Anbar Abad）和扎兰德（Zarand）仅在伊朗拥有室内运动场所的人均学生。因此，根据这些发现，我们可以得出结论，人均室内运动空间和得分之间存在显着差异。根据公共设施的等级，第一等级属于克尔曼，基于室内所有专家设备的所有等级，第一等级属于Kahnooj，而在户外场所，第一等级属于Zarand。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号